Global Lines in Conflicts in the Middle East

Journal Title: GÜVENLİK STRATEJİLERİ DERGİSİ - Year 2019, Vol 15, Issue 29

Abstract

My case is that current conflicts in the Middle East are not only conflicts between states or a Clash of Civilizations, but that glocal relative deprivation has caused a vacuum of power and conflicts between stationary states. To support my argument, I will discuss three paradigms and their ability for explaining the crisis in the Middle East: First, Carl Schmitt’s turn from Westphalian Governance to global lines (of a Nomos of Earth) as spheres of foreign non-interference, which is either used to propose unrealistic international solutions to a transnational crisis or, paradoxically, to back hegemonic interests in the region. Second, I will deconstruct Samuel Huntington’s paradigm of a Clash of Civilizations, which is based on dubious data and references to call for a Western hegemony that already exists beyond the classical imperialist understanding of it as global standards empowered with help of global horizons of comparability. Third, I will extend Hans-Ulrich Wehler’s sketch of reasons for modernization crisis in nation-states that is based on relative deprivation, identity-, participation-, distribution-, penetration-, and (culminating in a) legitimation-crisis, for analyzing conflicts in the Middle East as caused by glocal comparison and competition in world society. In summing, I intend to analyze the unrest in the Middle East as caused by glocal relative deprivation. This perspective enables us to deal with glocal political and social processes rather as represented than caused by global cultural or political conflicts between “civilizations” or states.

Authors and Affiliations

Andreas Leutzsch

Keywords

Related Articles

Makarenko’nun “Kara Delik Sendromu” Teorisi ve Terörizmin Finansmanında Sınıraşan Organize Suçlar

The subject of this study is to analyze the relationship between terrorism and transnational organized crime theoretically and chronologically and through examples that gained importance in both national and internationa...

Global Lines in Conflicts in the Middle East

My case is that current conflicts in the Middle East are not only conflicts between states or a Clash of Civilizations, but that glocal relative deprivation has caused a vacuum of power and conflicts between stationary s...

Avrupa’da Radikalleşme ve DAEŞ: DAEŞ’in Evrilmesi ve Avrupa Güvenliğine Yönelik Tehditler

The civil war in Syria, which started in 2011, took a completely different dimension in 2014, when the DAEŞ terrorist organization declared the Caliphate. The wars of Syria and Iraq, where many big and small actors were...

İç İstikrar, Refah ve Güç Hedefleri Ekseninde Çin’in Orta Doğu Politikası

This article seeks to examine the motives behind China’s active foreign policy toward the Middle East, using Fei-Ling Wang’s incentive structure of preservation (of its own political power), (economic) prosperity and (g...

Orta Doğu ve Doğu Akdeniz’in Önemi: Tehditler, Riskler, Fırsatlar ve Türkiye

The Republic of Turkey is in an incessant state of security concerns due to the unstable region of which she is a part. The purpose of this study is to take the post-Cold War threat and risk assessments conducted by vari...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP526180
  • DOI -
  • Views 87
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Andreas Leutzsch (2019). Global Lines in Conflicts in the Middle East. GÜVENLİK STRATEJİLERİ DERGİSİ, 15(29), 151-197. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-526180