Global Lines in Conflicts in the Middle East

Journal Title: GÜVENLİK STRATEJİLERİ DERGİSİ - Year 2019, Vol 15, Issue 29

Abstract

My case is that current conflicts in the Middle East are not only conflicts between states or a Clash of Civilizations, but that glocal relative deprivation has caused a vacuum of power and conflicts between stationary states. To support my argument, I will discuss three paradigms and their ability for explaining the crisis in the Middle East: First, Carl Schmitt’s turn from Westphalian Governance to global lines (of a Nomos of Earth) as spheres of foreign non-interference, which is either used to propose unrealistic international solutions to a transnational crisis or, paradoxically, to back hegemonic interests in the region. Second, I will deconstruct Samuel Huntington’s paradigm of a Clash of Civilizations, which is based on dubious data and references to call for a Western hegemony that already exists beyond the classical imperialist understanding of it as global standards empowered with help of global horizons of comparability. Third, I will extend Hans-Ulrich Wehler’s sketch of reasons for modernization crisis in nation-states that is based on relative deprivation, identity-, participation-, distribution-, penetration-, and (culminating in a) legitimation-crisis, for analyzing conflicts in the Middle East as caused by glocal comparison and competition in world society. In summing, I intend to analyze the unrest in the Middle East as caused by glocal relative deprivation. This perspective enables us to deal with glocal political and social processes rather as represented than caused by global cultural or political conflicts between “civilizations” or states.

Authors and Affiliations

Andreas Leutzsch

Keywords

Related Articles

Understanding the Continuity and Change in the European Union’s Policies on the Mediterranean and the MENA Region after the Arab “Spring” Uprisings

The literature on traditional and critical security studies mostly point out at a paradigm shift concerning the nature of security threats and challenges either caused or impacted upon by state, non-state, and transnatio...

Uluslararası İlişkiler ve Uluslararası Göç Bağlamında İnsan Ticareti

With increased and diversified mixed migration flows across the world, international human trafficking has become one of the most critical global challenges of the 21st century. The growing interest in the “global fight...

Radikalizm ve Aşırıcılıktan Terörizme: Siyasal Şiddetin Araçsallaştırılması

After 9/11 attacks, discussions on the efficiency of global struggle against terrorist groups forced governments to seek new strategies in counterterrorism. In many terrorism studies, researchers tried to find answers to...

Dugin’in Avrasyacılık Anlayışında Türkiye’nin Yeri

Eurasianism, which is a movement of idea that emerged in time of crisis in Russia, gained influence in the Russian political thought at the end of the 1980s, when the USSR began to give signs of collapse. This understand...

Terör-Medya İlişkisi ve Medyada Terör Haberciliği

Supporting the campaign against terrorism without doing any propaganda of terrorist organizations and informing people is one of the main duties of media. How can media achieve it? This is the question for which this stu...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP526180
  • DOI -
  • Views 75
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Andreas Leutzsch (2019). Global Lines in Conflicts in the Middle East. GÜVENLİK STRATEJİLERİ DERGİSİ, 15(29), 151-197. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-526180