Glosa do wyroku Międzynarodowego Trybunału Sprawiedliwości z 1 października 2018 r. w sprawie obowiązku negocjacji dostępu do Oceanu Spokojnego (Boliwia v. Chile)
Journal Title: PRZEGLĄD SEJMOWY - Year 2019, Vol 152, Issue 3
Abstract
The judgment of the International Court of Justice of 1 October 2018 in the case concerning the obligation to negotiate access to the Pacific Ocean refers to a territorial dispute between Bolivia and Chile, resulting from the loss of the access to the sea by Bolivia as a consequence of an armed conflict with Chile in 1880s. Filing a complaint in 2013, Bolivia demanded that the Court rule that Chile is obliged to enter into negotiations therewith as regards obtaining an agreement guaranteeing its full, sovereign access to the Pacific Ocean. Bolivia derived this duty from agreements it concluded with Chile, Chile’s unilateral acts, general principles of law, particularly estoppel, acquiescence and justified expectations, as well as resolutions of the Organisation of American States. Chile interpreted the bilateral relations in this scope differently and claimed that the duty of this kind had not arisen. This year, with the panel’s 12:3 decision, the Court decided that Chile does not have an obligation to negotiate with Bolivia its sovereign access to the Pacific Ocean. To the judgment there are attached: the declaration by judge A. Yusuf and dissenting opinions of judge P. Robinson, judge N. Salam and judge ad hoc Y. Daudet.
Authors and Affiliations
Łukasz Kułaga
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP595900
- DOI 10.31268/PS.2019.44
- Views 44
- Downloads 0
W sprawie terminów odnoszących się do procedury zgłaszania kandydatów na sędziów — członków Krajowej Rady Sądownictwa
The opinion is based on the analysis of a number of detailed problems related to the procedure for submitting candidatures for members of the National Council of the Judiciary, from among judges, in relation to the provi...
Skarga na przewlekłość postępowania sądowego z perspektywy standardów konstytucyjnego prawa do sądu
The excessive length of judicial and administrative proceedings is not rare in our country. The legislature, bound especially by the requirements of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freed...
Uwagi Maurycego Zdzisława Jaroszyńskiego o ustroju Polski po śmierci marszałka Józefa Piłsudskiego
The study recalls an unknown statement by Maurycy Jaroszyński from the time of the war, containing an analysis of the government of 1926–1939. This opinion is critical, and its justification shows the incompatibility of...
Jerzy Ciemniewski (1939–2018). Wspomnienie
W dniu 11 stycznia 2018 r. w Warszawie zmarł profesor Jerzy Ciemniewski. Prawnik, polityk, uczony, sędzia Trybunału Konstytucyjnego w stanie spoczynku, od 2008 r. związany z Redakcją „Przeglądu Sejmowego”, gdzie pełnił f...
System wyborczy do dwuizbowego Sejmu w świetle inicjatyw prawodawczych Rady Stanu Królestwa Polskiego (czerwiec–wrzesień 1918 r.)
Legislative work carried out from 27 June to 5 September 1918 by the Council of State and the Sejm Committee constituted another step in the process of creating an electoral system for the Sejm on the territories of the...