Glosa do wyroku Międzynarodowego Trybunału Sprawiedliwości z 1 października 2018 r. w sprawie obowiązku negocjacji dostępu do Oceanu Spokojnego (Boliwia v. Chile)
Journal Title: PRZEGLĄD SEJMOWY - Year 2019, Vol 152, Issue 3
Abstract
The judgment of the International Court of Justice of 1 October 2018 in the case concerning the obligation to negotiate access to the Pacific Ocean refers to a territorial dispute between Bolivia and Chile, resulting from the loss of the access to the sea by Bolivia as a consequence of an armed conflict with Chile in 1880s. Filing a complaint in 2013, Bolivia demanded that the Court rule that Chile is obliged to enter into negotiations therewith as regards obtaining an agreement guaranteeing its full, sovereign access to the Pacific Ocean. Bolivia derived this duty from agreements it concluded with Chile, Chile’s unilateral acts, general principles of law, particularly estoppel, acquiescence and justified expectations, as well as resolutions of the Organisation of American States. Chile interpreted the bilateral relations in this scope differently and claimed that the duty of this kind had not arisen. This year, with the panel’s 12:3 decision, the Court decided that Chile does not have an obligation to negotiate with Bolivia its sovereign access to the Pacific Ocean. To the judgment there are attached: the declaration by judge A. Yusuf and dissenting opinions of judge P. Robinson, judge N. Salam and judge ad hoc Y. Daudet.
Authors and Affiliations
Łukasz Kułaga
Aksjologia Konstytucji RP z 1997 roku. Perspektywa badacza myśli politycznej
By pointing to the two meanings of the term “constitutionalism”, the author attempts to derive axiological context from “political morality” which precedes the content of the basic law. He concludes that it can only be d...
Instytucja materialnoprawna cofnięcie uprawnienia
The principle of sustainability of final administrative decisions is fundamental for administrative proceedings. An addressee of an administrative act may be deprived of his/her administrative legal right only when prere...
W sprawie oceny zgodności z Konstytucją RP nowelizacji ustawy o Instytucie Pamięci Narodowej — Komisji Ścigania Zbrodni przeciwko Narodowi Polskiemu, w szczególności dodanego art. 55a
The opinion concerns the evaluation of consistency with the Constitution of the Republic of Poland of 2 April 1997 of Article 55a of the Act of 26 January 2018 on the Institute of National Remembrance — Commission for th...
Sprawozdanie z XXI konferencji „Europa Karpat”, Krynica-Zdrój, 5–6 września 2018 r.
On 5 and 6 September 2018, the 21st “Europe of the Carpathians” conference was held, organized as a part of the 28th Economic Forum in Krynica-Zdroj. This year’s edition was scheduled for two days and comprised nine pane...
Okrągły Stół w Polsce: 30 lat sporów o znaczenie i skutki
The issue discussed in the article falls within the area of historical policy. The past is an important field of political rivalry and building collective memory, it allows political circles to influence attitudes and be...