Glosa do wyroku Międzynarodowego Trybunału Sprawiedliwości z 1 października 2018 r. w sprawie obowiązku negocjacji dostępu do Oceanu Spokojnego (Boliwia v. Chile)

Journal Title: PRZEGLĄD SEJMOWY - Year 2019, Vol 152, Issue 3

Abstract

The judgment of the International Court of Justice of 1 October 2018 in the case concerning the obligation to negotiate access to the Pacific Ocean refers to a territorial dispute between Bolivia and Chile, resulting from the loss of the access to the sea by Bolivia as a consequence of an armed conflict with Chile in 1880s. Filing a complaint in 2013, Bolivia demanded that the Court rule that Chile is obliged to enter into negotiations therewith as regards obtaining an agreement guaranteeing its full, sovereign access to the Pacific Ocean. Bolivia derived this duty from agreements it concluded with Chile, Chile’s unilateral acts, general principles of law, particularly estoppel, acquiescence and justified expectations, as well as resolutions of the Organisation of American States. Chile interpreted the bilateral relations in this scope differently and claimed that the duty of this kind had not arisen. This year, with the panel’s 12:3 decision, the Court decided that Chile does not have an obligation to negotiate with Bolivia its sovereign access to the Pacific Ocean. To the judgment there are attached: the declaration by judge A. Yusuf and dissenting opinions of judge P. Robinson, judge N. Salam and judge ad hoc Y. Daudet.

Authors and Affiliations

Łukasz Kułaga

Keywords

Related Articles

Najwyższe zwierzchnictwo Prezydenta Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej nad siłami zbrojnymi w świetle konstytucji z 2 kwietnia 1997 roku red. Michał Szewczyk

The author discusses the important issue of the supreme command of the armed forces vested in the President of the Republic of Poland, as established by the Polish Constitution. General principles of the civil and democr...

W sprawie projektu ustawy o zasadach ustalenia kolejności obsadzania mandatów posłów do Parlamentu Europejskiego wybieranych w Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej na kadencję 2019–2024

The opinion contains the legal analysis of the bill on the principles for establishing the order of filling the mandates of the Deputies to the European Parliament elected by the Republic of Poland for the term 2019–2024...

Sprzeciw sumienia w orzecznictwie ETPC (na podstawie wyroku Wielkiej Izby z 7 lipca 2011 r. w sprawie Bayatyan v. Armenia)

The article provides an analysis of judgment of Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights of 7 July 2011 in the case of Bayatyan v. Armenia, in which the Court, based on the “living instrument” doctrine, gives...

Konstytucyjność bożonarodzeniowej symboliki w przestrzeni publicznej w świetle orzecznictwa sądów Stanów Zjednoczonych

The article deals with the issue of legality of displaying Christmas symbols, in particular creche, on public property. The problem is considered in the context of the constitutional freedom of speech and the Establishme...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP595900
  • DOI 10.31268/PS.2019.44
  • Views 28
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Łukasz Kułaga (2019). Glosa do wyroku Międzynarodowego Trybunału Sprawiedliwości z 1 października 2018 r. w sprawie obowiązku negocjacji dostępu do Oceanu Spokojnego (Boliwia v. Chile). PRZEGLĄD SEJMOWY, 152(3), 141-150. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-595900