Glosa do wyroku Sądu Najwyższego z dnia 17 lutego 2016 r., III KK 394/15

Journal Title: Białostockie Studia Prawnicze - Year 2018, Vol 0, Issue 23

Abstract

Pokrzywdzony jednym z przestępstw określonych w art. 197-199 kk., będący osobą najbliższą dla oskarżonego, po rozpoczęciu zeznania podczas przesłuchania przez sąd w trybie art. 185c § 2 kpk. nie traci uprawnienia do odmowy składania zeznań w rozumieniu art. 186 § 1 kpk., ponieważ przesłuchanie to nie jest elementem postępowania sądowego, lecz czynnością sądową w postępowaniu przygotowawczym – rozdział 38 Kodeksu postępowania karnego.

Authors and Affiliations

Katarzyna Wiktorzak

Keywords

Related Articles

The President of the European Council – from Rotation to Election

Th is article discusses the principles of election of the President of the European Council, modifi ed by the Treaty of Lisbon. Th e current procedure for selecting a permanent President of the European Council is presen...

Voting Rights for Immigrants. Refl ections on the Background of EU Citizenship

Voting rights are traditionally associated with the institution of citizenship. Th is relationship, however,is subjected to change, i.e. under the infl uence of globalization and international migration. Th e scope of mi...

The Fragility of a Culture of Lawfulness

Th e concept of a culture of lawfulness is appealing for its aspirational and open-ended nature. However, the concept still has to prove itself as a concrete basis for action. Th e article argues that the practical value...

Th e Model of Disciplinary Proceedings Against Prosecutors – Selected Issues

The article discusses possible models of disciplinary proceedings against prosecutors in Poland. In the fi rst, the so-called “corporate” model, disciplinary commissions of both instances are composed only of prosecutors...

People with Disabilities as a Vulnerable Group. The Concept of Protection of the Rights of Vulnerable Groups

The social model of disability, which focuses on determining the reasons for disabilities not connected with the individual as such, but pointing at the social barriers that limit the individual in the environment where...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP520844
  • DOI 10.15290/bsp.2018.23.01.16
  • Views 43
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Katarzyna Wiktorzak (2018). Glosa do wyroku Sądu Najwyższego z dnia 17 lutego 2016 r., III KK 394/15. Białostockie Studia Prawnicze, 0(23), 233-241. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-520844