Glosa krytyczna do uchwały składu 7 sędziów Sądu Najwyższego z 25 lutego 2016 r. (I KZP 20/15)

Journal Title: Studia Iuridica - Year 2017, Vol 72, Issue

Abstract

The Supreme Court’s resolution of 25 February 2016 states that the statutory term „person in cohabitation” permits the absence of gender difference, extending in practice new civil and criminal-procedural rights of homosexual couples. It also points to physical, spiritual and economic ties between partners, but if one of them is objectively justified, it does not change the nature of a relationship at all. This is the same field for numerous abuses. Resolution breaks as a consequence with the dominant and long-established case law and opinion of doctrine, degrading role and social mission of the family. As a result of the broad and inconsistent interpretation of notion as well incompatibility with argumentation of the Constitutional Tribunal the use of term for specific situations can cause a number of interpretational doubts and deepen legal chaos.<br/><br/>

Authors and Affiliations

Bartłomiej Baran

Keywords

Related Articles

O kilku problemach działalności arbitrażu w Polsce

Lawyers involved in arbitration have doubts about the accuracy of the direction in which the current practice of arbitration is proceeding. One of the main practical issues of arbitration was the issue of conflicts of in...

Problem stosowania najważniejszych aktów prawa alimentacyjnego międzynarodowego w relacjach polsko-hiszpańskich w kontekście egzekucji alimentów na rzecz przebywającego w Polsce dziecka od zobowiązanego przebywającego w Hiszpanii

This publication presents the evolution of international law acts in the scope of alimony execution from the obliged one residing on the territory of Spain, for the benefit of a child, having the enforcement order and re...

Dziedzictwo prawne Leona Petrażyckiego w nowoczesnej doktrynie prawnej Ukrainy

The paper aims to study the work of Leon Petrazycki and analyze modern Ukrainian scholars’ opinions on Petrazycki’s scientific achievements. This study focuses on Petrazycki’s work, his psychological theory, in particula...

Organized Criminal Activity as Special Form of Joint (Group) Feasance of Crimes

Organized criminal activity is special, different from criminal complicity – commission of a single crime by several people, a form of crime commission at a highly organized level by people united in a stable criminal fo...

Z prawnej problematyki ochrony przychodów rolniczych

The article refers to the issues of various instruments of agricultural income support. They apply in the situation of risk occurrence in agricultural production and are regulated by both EU and Polish legislation. The a...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP345582
  • DOI 10.5604/01.3001.0011.7585
  • Views 102
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Bartłomiej Baran (2017). Glosa krytyczna do uchwały składu 7 sędziów Sądu Najwyższego z 25 lutego 2016 r. (I KZP 20/15). Studia Iuridica, 72(), 29-40. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-345582