Glosa krytyczna do uchwały składu 7 sędziów Sądu Najwyższego z 25 lutego 2016 r. (I KZP 20/15)

Journal Title: Studia Iuridica - Year 2017, Vol 72, Issue

Abstract

The Supreme Court’s resolution of 25 February 2016 states that the statutory term „person in cohabitation” permits the absence of gender difference, extending in practice new civil and criminal-procedural rights of homosexual couples. It also points to physical, spiritual and economic ties between partners, but if one of them is objectively justified, it does not change the nature of a relationship at all. This is the same field for numerous abuses. Resolution breaks as a consequence with the dominant and long-established case law and opinion of doctrine, degrading role and social mission of the family. As a result of the broad and inconsistent interpretation of notion as well incompatibility with argumentation of the Constitutional Tribunal the use of term for specific situations can cause a number of interpretational doubts and deepen legal chaos.<br/><br/>

Authors and Affiliations

Bartłomiej Baran

Keywords

Related Articles

Prawne aspekty kwalifikacji stosunku prawnego jako umowy kontraktacji w świetle orzecznictwa sądów powszechnych

The object of considerations is legal issue of qualification of legal relations as cultivation contract in accordance with article 613–622 of Civil Code. Cultivation contract has productive character. Its subject is clos...

Tradycja petrażycjańska w polskiej socjologii prawa albo o tym, co zyskaliśmy, nie odwołując się do Ehrlicha

The goal of the presented paper is to show the qualities of Polish sociology of law that arise from how it formed and developed under the influence of a particular theoretical inspiration – the theory of Leon Petrażycki...

Ewolucja regulacji prawnych w bankowości spółdzielczej w Polsce

Cooperative banking in Poland has more than 150 years of tradition, going back to the period of Partitions. The first Polish credit associations and cooperatives were established in Greater Poland in the years 1861–1862,...

Is it Possible and Worthwhile to Promote a World-Wide Model of Criminal Procedure?

This paper canvasses some of the limitations and possible negative consequences of globalization of criminal procedure. The references to specific examples in this paper assume generally the framework of the legal system...

Disruptive Forces at our Doors: Challenges for the Legal Profession and Legal Education

Zmiany są nieuniknione, a często uciążliwe. Jest to szczególnie widoczne zarówno w zawodach prawniczych, jak i edukacji prawniczej. Zmiany bywają destrukcyjne, stosowanie natomiast proporcjonalnych środków prowadzi do sk...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP345582
  • DOI 10.5604/01.3001.0011.7585
  • Views 97
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Bartłomiej Baran (2017). Glosa krytyczna do uchwały składu 7 sędziów Sądu Najwyższego z 25 lutego 2016 r. (I KZP 20/15). Studia Iuridica, 72(), 29-40. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-345582