GLOSS TO JUDGMENT OF THE SUPREME ADMINISTRATIVE COURT OF 2 FEBRUARY 2016 I OSK 417/15, LEGALIS NO. 1408450

Journal Title: Annuals of the Administration and Law - Year 2017, Vol 0, Issue 0

Abstract

“It should be approved”, this is the view of the Supreme Administrative Court confirming that it was obvious that land for homesteading differed from construction land. It is because land for homesteading was agricultural land on which buildings may be constructed that are related to a farm.<br/><br/>

Authors and Affiliations

Katarzyna Czerwińska-Koral

Keywords

Related Articles

INTERNATIONAL NORMATIVE FRAME-WORK OF THE SELF-GOVERNMENT ADMINISTRATION – DRAFT OF THE PROBLEM

There are customary and treaty norms in the international Self-Government regulations, which may have universal, regional and subregional ranges. Term European Law is not correct (precise), because of existence of severa...

SELECTED LEGAL ISSUES OF PLANNING FEES CALCULATION

The analysis of selected court judgments published in the Central Database of Decisions of Administrative Courts in the period from 1 January 2014 to 10 October 2016 was presented in the paper. The aim of the analysis wa...

WYBRANE PROBLEMY KSZTAŁTOWANIA WYSOKOŚCI WYNAGRODZENIA ZA PRACĘ

Związek normatywny prawa pracy z prawem cywilnym uwidacznia się zwłaszcza w art. 300 k.p., którego warunki spełnia przepis art. 3531 k.c. Instytucja wyzysku z kolei ingeruje w swobodę stron w kształtowaniu w drodze umowy...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP391353
  • DOI -
  • Views 97
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Katarzyna Czerwińska-Koral (2017). GLOSS TO JUDGMENT OF THE SUPREME ADMINISTRATIVE COURT OF 2 FEBRUARY 2016 I OSK 417/15, LEGALIS NO. 1408450. Annuals of the Administration and Law, 0(0), 487-496. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-391353