Gongola Basin Geoid Determination using Isostatic Models and Seismic Reflection Data and Geophysical Interpretation

Journal Title: Геофизический журнал - Year 2016, Vol 38, Issue 6

Abstract

The application of Stokes’ formula to create geoid undulation requires no masses outside the geoid. Usually, a constant density of 2.67g / cm3 is used in the determination of the geoid which introduces error in the reduced gravity anomalies (Helmert’s condensation) and consequently the geoid. In this paper, isostatic models of Airy-Heiskanen and Pratt-Hayford were utilized in the determination of the geoid by considering the planar and spherical approximation models. The indirect effect of the topographic lateral density variation on the geoid was computed as additive correction for the improvement of the accuracy of the computed geoid. Additional density information deduced from seismic and well log data was considered for the variable density computation. The geopotential geoid undulations were computed from the EGM 2008 model. The residual geoid was obtained by subtracting the local isostatic geoid from the geopential geoid. Geoid and gravity admittance studies were also carried out to complement the results from the residual geoid. The planar and spherical approximation results showed similar characteristics; but a change in magnitude in both models. Our results suggest that the effects of topographic lateral density variations in geoid determination are significant and should be considered in rift basins. The geophysical analysis of the geoid results show that the north-east domain has positive residual geoid which indicates the presence of high density intrusive igneous rocks, while the south-east has negative residual geoid which indicates the dominant presence of low density sedimentary rocks. The results also show that the radial distribution of the anomalous mass obtained using the geoid/residual geoid anomaly uniquely matched that obtained using the seismic reflection data which inferred the presence of hydrocarbon accumulation in the south east zone of the project area. The gravity and geoid admittance studies corroborated the residual geoid and seismic reflection results.

Authors and Affiliations

E. E. Epuh, J. B. Olaleye, O. G. Omogunloye

Keywords

Related Articles

In memory of the outstanding scientist-ore-finder Sergey Valentinovich Nechaev (03.03.1932-04.08.2018)

In memory of the outstanding scientist-ore-finder Sergey Valentinovich Nechaev (03.03.1932-04.08.2018)

Electromagnetic studies of Zvizdal-Zaliska and Brusyliv fault zones of the Ukrainian shield

Spatial-temporal distribution pattern of geomagnetic variations and electric field in the western part of the Ukrainian shield has been obtained as a result of experimental studies carried out by the methods of deep magn...

Relationship of climate changes with geomagnetic field. P. 3. Northern and Southern hemispheres

Differences of relations between geomagnetic field and climate for Northern and Southern hemispheres considered earlier have been shown. They are connected, first of all, with the depth of penetration of the charged part...

Electromagnetic-deformational waves of the Earth crust

This article briefly analyzes mechanisms of mechanoelectromagnetic transformations of the earth’s crust. It demostrates that the presence of these effects leads to the appearance of electromagnetic satellites, which are...

Minimization risk technique for solving gravity inverse problems in weak assumptions about geological noise properties

The concept of the hidden information on the gravity anomaly sources as joint fragment of the true and model disturbing objects was introduced. In the presence of uncertainty inherent in inverse problems, limit possibili...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP197155
  • DOI 10.24028/gzh.0203-3100.v38i6.2016.91883
  • Views 105
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

E. E. Epuh, J. B. Olaleye, O. G. Omogunloye (2016). Gongola Basin Geoid Determination using Isostatic Models and Seismic Reflection Data and Geophysical Interpretation. Геофизический журнал, 38(6), 137-151. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-197155