Ground Penetrating Radar’s (GPR) imaging and applications to pavement structural assessment: a case of Malaysia

Journal Title: Archives of Transport - Year 2017, Vol 42, Issue 2

Abstract

Traditionally, pavement distress evaluations were carried out by visual observation. Traditional practice requires a person to walk along the stretch of the pavement to conduct distress survey, take photo and measure defects occurred at deteriorated surfaces. However, this approach is too subjective, generates inconsistencies of information, less reliable and time-consuming. Due to these shortcomings, the transportation practitioners in pavement maintenance seek for other alternative tools and techniques to arrest incapability of traditional practices. One of the tools available in the market is Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR). GPR is a geophysical tool known by ability to accommodate extensive data in pavement assessment, geotechnical investigation and structural assessment. The application of GPR is such new to most of road maintenance industry in Malaysia. Therefore, this study has been undertaken to evaluate the benefits of using GPR imaging and its application in assessing pavement structures in Malaysia. The GPR survey was conducted in Meranti street located at UTM (Universiti Teknologi Malaysia) campus, and then analyzed using REFLEX 2D simulation software. The finding shows there are three (3) types of information obtained from GPR survey included; identification of raw image and processed image, identification of pavement segments thickness, and identification of GPR response towards surface and subsurface conditions, which illustrated in radargram images. Furthermore, the GPR can perform at high speed and can save time. It is also beneficial for long-term investment due to ability to provide extensive information at a greater depth. The research indicates that interpretation of GPR’s radargram images consumes time due to the low resolution. Therefore, selection of GPR system is subject to level of accuracy and clarity of radar images needed in a project.<br/><br/>

Authors and Affiliations

Nurul Hidayah Muslim, Mohamad Ibrahim Mohamed, Zulkarnaini Mat Amin, Arezou Shafaghat, Mohammad Ismail, Ali Keyvanfar

Keywords

Related Articles

Inland water transport development possibilities – case study of lower Vistula river

Among different transportation modes, inland water transport is recognized as a low-cost, environmentally friendly way of transporting. The use of this mode in Poland encounters many challenges. Thus, the investigation o...

Development Trends for Automatic Train Protection systems

The elaboration shows basic requirements fulfilled by controlling devices, together with work sequences of each particular configuration. These devices are commonly used in railway and subway networks and they ensure tra...

Conception of “4 Goals and 3 Levels” in Risk Management in Road Transport Systems

“Four goals and three levels” conception of risk management in transport comes out from triple interpretation the notion of system and from process approach to transport system interpretation. The title of the lecture su...

New threat to global transport. GNSS Receiver Spoofing

Transport and logistics in XXI century relies on the several technical systems for assuring safe and reliable operations. One of widely used systems are satellite positioning systems, used to monitoring transport means a...

Decisional processing on parking behavior in entropic settings

This paper surveys the most recent advances in the context of decisional processing with focusing on the parking behavior in entropic settings, including the measures and the necessary mechanisms for the interaction of t...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP189504
  • DOI 10.5604/01.3001.0010.0526
  • Views 112
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Nurul Hidayah Muslim, Mohamad Ibrahim Mohamed, Zulkarnaini Mat Amin, Arezou Shafaghat, Mohammad Ismail, Ali Keyvanfar (2017). Ground Penetrating Radar’s (GPR) imaging and applications to pavement structural assessment: a case of Malaysia. Archives of Transport, 42(2), 39-51. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-189504