HAEMODYNAMIC RESPONSES TO LARYNGOSCOPY AND ENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATION AFTER INTRAVENOUS DEXMEDETOMIDINE: A COMPARISON BETWEEN TWO DOSES

Journal Title: Journal of Evidence Based Medicine and Healthcare - Year 2019, Vol 6, Issue 8

Abstract

BACKGROUND Many pharmacological drugs are used to attenuate the haemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation. Dexmedetomidine, a highly selective α2 agonist has pharmacological properties like sedation, sympatholysis, analgesic property and less respiratory depression with preservation of the ventilator response to carbon dioxide and makes it an ideal adjuvant drug during general anaesthesia, in comparison to other drugs. In this study we compared the effects of two different doses of Dexmedetomidine on the haemodynamic responses during laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation. MATERIALS AND METHODS Ninety patients of American society of anesthesiologists (ASA) physical grades I and II undergoing general anaesthesia were randomly allocated into three groups of 30 patients each. Values of heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) were recorded before giving the drug. Group A, Group B and Group C received 20 ml of Inj. Normal Saline, Inj. Dexmedetomidine 0.5 µg/Kg diluted to 20 ml with normal saline and dexmedetomidine 0.75 µg/Kg body weight diluted to 20 ml normal saline respectively as infusion over 10 minutes. Sedation scores were also recorded 1 min and 3 min after giving the test drugs. HR, SBP, DBP, MAP were recorded 1 min, 3 min, 5min, and 10 minutes after laryngoscopy and intubation. RESULTS The increase in HR, SBP, DBP and MAP after intubation were significantly less in Group C than Group A and Group and B and lasted longer than Group A and Group B. Sedation score was significantly low in Group C than Group A and Group B CONCLUSION Both the doses of Intravenous dexmedetomidine 0.5 µg/Kg body weight and 0.75 µg/Kg body weight attenuate the haemodynamic response of laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation, but the dose of 0.75 µg/Kg body was found to be more effective than 0.5 µg/Kg body weight.

Authors and Affiliations

Dhanachandra L. , Kameshwar Singh L.

Keywords

Related Articles

STUDY OF VITAMIN D LEVELS IN PATIENTS OF ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION

BACKGROUND Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is a major concern globally and recent studies explored the role of vitamin D deficiency as one of the predisposing factors and documented its deleterious effect both in morta...

SOFT TISSUE SARCOMAS – A CROSS SECTIONAL STUDY AT MNJIO

BACKGROUND: Sarcomas are an uncommon group of cancers with a wide distribution in the various anatomical regions of the body and even wider and confusing range of histopathological diagnosis. AIMS: To study the mode of p...

ACUTE PRESENTATION AND MANAGEMENT OF ABDOMINAL TUBERCULOSIS AT A TERTIARY CARE CENTRE

BACKGROUND Abdominal Tuberculosis (ABTB) is the most common extrapulmonary site affected by the diseases. Diagnosis of ABTB require a high index of suspicion because of its vague initial clinical presentation and absence...

A STUDY ON ENDOMETRIAL MORPHOLOGY AND GLYCOGEN CONTENT IN INFERTILE WOMEN

BACKGROUND Infertility is a common problem in day-to-day practice. Therefore, the common uterine pathology should be excluded while investigating infertility. Endometrial biopsy plays an important role in diagnosing infe...

STUDY OF OPEN CARPAL TUNNEL DECOMPRESSION UNDER LOCAL ANAESTHESIA WITHOUT TOURNIQUET

BACKGROUND Carpal tunnel syndrome is the entrapment neuropathy of the median nerve. It is more common in females than males, surgery is indicated when conservative treatment fails. AIM OF THE STUDY To assess the effectiv...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP610982
  • DOI 10.18410/jebmh/2019/108
  • Views 78
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Dhanachandra L. , Kameshwar Singh L. (2019). HAEMODYNAMIC RESPONSES TO LARYNGOSCOPY AND ENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATION AFTER INTRAVENOUS DEXMEDETOMIDINE: A COMPARISON BETWEEN TWO DOSES. Journal of Evidence Based Medicine and Healthcare, 6(8), 520-526. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-610982