HARMONIZATION OF NATIONAL PROCEDURAL PROVISIONS CONCERNING THE ENFORCEMENT OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS

Journal Title: Challenges of the Knowledge Society - Year 2015, Vol 5, Issue 0

Abstract

This short paper looks at provisions concerning very specific aspects provided for at international, regional and national level and analyzes the level of harmonization between such. Given the importance of provisional measures (and especially of preliminary injunctions) for the protection of intellectual property rights, the provisions concerning this subject were the main focus of our analysis. Found in TRIPS, the EU IP Enforcement Directive and national Romanian statutory provisions, we’ve concluded that these are not directly applicable in disputes in Romanian courts and were therefore, as a result of multiple international obligations, supposed to be harmonized. We’ve looked at different aspects in parallel with the development of implementation mechanisms and found that, despite the aforementioned obligations, not even the Directive is fully TRIPS compliant, let alone the Romanian national statutory provisions. We’ve therefore concluded that, even if common sense would dictate that protection at more levels would equal more protection this is not necessarily true, given the fact that multiple harmonization requirements create more opportunity for divergent implementation results – influenced by either benign factors (different national legal traditions, different interpretations) or malign (lack of perspective and/or understanding, rush to implementation).

Authors and Affiliations

Paul-George BUTA

Keywords

Related Articles

THE REGULATION. THE DECISION. THE DIRECTIVE. LEGISLATIVE DIFFFERENCES

The article is set to establish the elements that determined the European legislator, within the Lisbon Treaty, to conclude that for certain regulatory domains a specific type of legislative act is to be used (regulation...

LANDMARKS IN THE EVOLUTION OF THE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY OF ORGANIZATIONS IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY

The social responsibility of organizations concept has become the subject of considerable researches, debates and commentaries especially in the second half of the last century. According to ethical principles organizati...

FEMINISM AND COSMOPOLITANISM: SOME INEVITABLE CONNECTIONS

In this paper I will approach the issue of feminism and cosmopolitanism in order to give arguments in sustaining the fact that, today, feminism and cosmopolitanism are inevitable connected. In constructing my discourse I...

STABILITY AND CONSTITUTIONAL REFORM NORMATIVE CONTENTS OF CONSTITUTION

The modification of the fundamental law of a state represents a very special political and juridical act with major significances and implications in the political social system as in the state’s one, but also at each in...

THE EVOLUTION OF ROMANIAN JUDICIAL SYSTEM SEEN THROUGH THE LAST MONITORING REPORT

Even though great strides have been made in this direction, Judicial reform and fighting corruption continue to represent major points in the evolution of Romanian society, in the context of compliance with European stan...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP122403
  • DOI -
  • Views 96
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Paul-George BUTA (2015). HARMONIZATION OF NATIONAL PROCEDURAL PROVISIONS CONCERNING THE ENFORCEMENT OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS. Challenges of the Knowledge Society, 5(0), 557-564. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-122403