Health Technology Assessment and Ethics Health
Journal Title: Biomedical Journal of Scientific & Technical Research (BJSTR) - Year 2018, Vol 9, Issue 3
Abstract
A trend or a useful tool? HTA (Health Technology Assessment) was born in the 70s as a tool to support decision makers in the health sector and has been quickly developing since, also with the creation of specialized international agencies (e.g. Health Technology Assessment International – HTAi; International Network of Assessment Agencies of health technologies - INAHTA). What is HTA? It is the “systematic evaluation of the properties and effects of a health technology, which addresses the direct and expected effects of this technology, as well as its indirect and unintended consequences, and aims primarily to inform decision-makers on health technologies” [1]. The approach is interdisciplinary, because HTA summarizes information on medical, social, economic and ethical issues, and methods of evaluation can be different [2]. Since of its born, ethics has been considered a key element in HTA, even if there is still not an agreement on “why” and “how” ethics should be integrated in HTA. This difficulty is not new and it mainly due to the narrowing of HTA to economic analysis. In 2004, ten Have has listed some potential reasons of this situation: a) Existing approaches for ethical inquiry are not suitable for HTA;M b) Technologies are often considered by HTA producers as being value-free; c) The only questions perceived as relevant in an HTA are technical and economical ones; d) Value issues may be acknowledged to be present at all levels in HTA, but ethics is not needed to address these issues; e) It is practically difficult to integrate ethical considerations in HTA; f) HTA experts are not trained to make ethical assessments and there is too little expertise on ethics and HTA; g. Limited resources available to conduct ethical analyses [3]. Current Debate on Ethics in HTA: Why is ethics necessary in HTA? HTA represents a bridge between the scientific world (of research) and the political world (of decisions). When a decision must be made, we have to deal with questions that are not only qualitative (technical) but also quantitative (meaning and value). In technology, we can find answers regarding safety, effectiveness, efficiency and economic impact (quantitative questions), but not answers to ethical questions (qualitative questions). For example: Does the technology in question respect human’s life? Does it improve the patient’s quality of life? Is it accessible to everyone in the health system?
Authors and Affiliations
Di Pietro ML, Zaçe D
Restoring a Fractured Central Incisor: A Challenge to Overcome
Restoring a single central incisor should aim at preserving the affected tooth as well as re-establishing function and esthetic. This clinical report describes a patient with compromised smile due to the fracture of the...
A Rare Case of Spontaneous Pneumopericardium
Pneumopericardium is defined as a collection of air or gas in the pericardial cavity, its causes are usually secondary to trauma or mechanical ventilation, but spontaneous cases are very rare [1]. A 54-year-old man prese...
Reductionism and Nursing Clinical Reality
Biomedicine has been a significant force in medical and nursing research and understanding, and described by some as the cornerstone of laboratory-based diagnosis and care within modern health [1]. Biomedicine’s in-vitro...
Non-Neoplastic Lesions that may Mimic Epithelial Malignancies of the Endometrium: Morphological and Immunohistochemical Analysis
In this paper the author describes the morphological and immunohistochemical features of the most common benign epithelial lesions of the endometrium, which can be mistaken for neoplastic malignancies...
Goldenhar syndrome: An oculo-auriculo-mandible syndrome was reported
In A 2-month-old girl with suffer from eye-facial problems was referred to our clinic. The baby was full-term [1,2] delivery without complications. She had limbal dermoid of left eye with 3mm diameter and both eyes with...