High flow nasal cannula vs non-invasive ventilation in pediatric ARDS: an RCT

Journal Title: Pediatric Review: International Journal of Pediatric Research - Year 2018, Vol 5, Issue 11

Abstract

Introduction: Pediatric Acute Respiratory Distress syndrome (PARDS) has been re-defined (2015) as per the final recommendations of the Pediatric Acute Lung Injury Consensus Conference. The use of high flow nasal cannula is a promising treatment but its efficacy compared with non invasive ventilation (NIV) is not known.Aims and Objectives: The current study was undertaken to study the efficacy of high flow nasal cannula compared with NIV in PARDS. Methods: This was a pilot randomized controlled trial done in the PICU of a tertiary care teaching hospital over 10 months (December 2017 – September 2018). All patients aged 1-18 years of age, who presented with or developed ARDS during their course of hospitalization, and who fulfilled the inclusion criteria, were randomized to receive HFNC and Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (NIV) as the initial respiratory support.Details were noted in a pre-designed standardized data collection form, entered into MS-EXCEL worksheet 2013 and analyzed using the Epi info software version 7.2.0.1. Results: A total of 40 patients were enrolled, 20 in each arm.Of these majority (25/40=62.5%) were boys. Majority of these patients were from rural or semi-urban areas (28/40=70.0%) and belonged to low socio-economic class (33/40= 82.5%) patients.Underlying diagnosis was sepsis in the majority (27/40=67.5%) patients.Twenty one (23/40=57.5%) patients had co-existent pneumonia.Development of hemodynamic instability approached statistical significance in being low in HFNC group compared with the CPAP group (p=0.07; OR 0.206, 95% CI 0.036-0.159).Subsequent requirement of invasive ventilation was also low in HFNC group compared with CPAP group and approached significance (p=0.09; OR 1.653, 95% CI 0.074-1.246). Total duration of respiratory support (p=0.62) was comparable in both the groups. Conclusion: HFNC is efficacious in managing PARDS. Subsequent requirement of invasive ventilation and hemodynamic deterioration was significantly low with HFNC compared with NIV (CPAP).

Authors and Affiliations

Surabhi Chandra, Vijayshri Vijayshri, Aditi Gupta, Pratishtha Goyal, P. L. Prasad

Keywords

Related Articles

Demographic profile of children with acute lower respiratory tract infections of age between 2months to 5 years

Background: Acute respiratory infections are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in under-five children in developing countries. Hence, the present study was undertaken to study the various demographic risk factor...

Biophysical profile of blood pressure in urban school children

Background: A Systematic review & meta-analysis revealed that there is ‘Strong evidence for tracking of Blood pressure from childhood to adulthood i.e., the Children in the upper percentile of Blood Pressure levels are m...

3 days vs. 7 days course of intravenous antibiotics for probable neonatal sepsis

Introduction: Duration of appropriate antibiotic therapy for neonatal sepsis does not have evidence-based guidelines. The rationale and safety of these recommendations have never been scientifically evaluated. Such untes...

Effect of Gayatrimantra chanting on cognitive functions in school children

Background: In Indian tradition chanting of Vedic mantras is a part and parcel of life. The sacred Gayatri mantra was explained in Rig Veda. It was initially explained by Vishwamitra maharshi. As it is concerned about su...

Microbiological profile in community acquired pneumonia in children

Introduction: Community acquired pneumonia (CAP) refers to an infection of the lung by a variety of micro-organisms acquired outside the hospital setting. Methods and Material: It was prospective study conducted at depar...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP496151
  • DOI 10.17511/ijpr.2018.11.07
  • Views 154
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Surabhi Chandra, Vijayshri Vijayshri, Aditi Gupta, Pratishtha Goyal, P. L. Prasad (2018). High flow nasal cannula vs non-invasive ventilation in pediatric ARDS: an RCT. Pediatric Review: International Journal of Pediatric Research, 5(11), 592-595. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-496151