Historical insights on ‘Quacks’ in Ayurveda

Journal Title: Journal of Ayurvedic and Herbal Medicine - Year 2016, Vol 2, Issue 6

Abstract

India has a great legacy of ancient knowledge of healthcare - ‘Ayurveda’ since the time immemorial. But unfortunately this science has been defamed and exploited by the medical mafia: the ‘quacks’ (unqualified Ayurveda practitioners including faith healers), who at many times are illiterate but they flourish and pretend to be Doctors or ‘Vaidyas’ (physicians) and misguide the people by prefixing ‘Dr.’ or ‘Vaidya’ before their names and suffixing the degrees like BAMS or MD at their clinic/dispenseries’ sign board. They are found everywhere in India, running their clinics in big cities/villages/small towns and even many times at roads by the name ‘Khandaani dawakhaana’, and large number of unaware or desperate people fall prey to them. Upsurge in renewed interest, appreciation and acceptability of Ayurveda around the world can act as a great hunting ground for all such crooks, who may be savvy in using technology and self-promotion, but have questionable credentials. Poet Galib thus describes the unenviable plight of sufferers whose ailment worsened after unauthenticated medication from a half-trained doctor: ‘‘...Marz Badhta Gaya, Jyon Jyon Dava Ki!’’ Present article attempts to limelight the disapproval or condemnation of such quacks as per ancient Ayurveda literature. “Ku Vaidyah: Nripa Doshathah” That quote from Sushruta Samhita means quacks arise if the King is incapable. Such quacks flourish and go about at large only at the connivance of the King (administrators).[1] Thus the quacks thrive due to Government failure, as the Health Department is busy carrying out "development work" and did not have manpower for the task of carrying out raids. Sushruta strongly condemns them. Interestingly, the term applied to such a charlatan and ignorant cheat in Sanskrit is “Kuvaidya” or “Kuhaka”, the latter meaning - cunning or sinful man. The English term of “Quack” having the same connotation suggests its evolution from the original “Kuhaka”. Charaka Samhita also flays and dispels quacks or persons impersonating as physicians with strong words. Charaka advised the patients that they should not take medicines prescribed by pseudo-physicians, as their prescriptions are dangerous than poison. They have quoted: “A wise patient desirous of longevity and health should not accept any medicine prescribed by a physician ignorant of the Ayurvedic principles of treatment. Sometimes, one might escape (death), even when thunderbolt of Indra has fallen on his head, but one can never survive if he takes medicines prescribed by a physician ignorant of the principles governing its application. If the one pretending to be a wise physician, without knowing the principles governing its applicability, prescribes a medicine for a patient, distressed, lying (on bed), having faith (in the former’s prescription), he, the mischievous one is a sinner, devoid of virtuous acts, the messenger of death (as it were), even a talk with him will lead a man to hell.”[2] Charaka further added: “Pseudo-physicians (quacks) in the garb of doctors try to catch the patients as the bird catchers catch their pray in the net. They are far away from the textual knowledge about the time of administering the therapy and its dosage. They are like the messengers of death on the earth; hence they should be boycotted. A wise patient should avoid such of the egoistic pseudo-physicians, the worst among idiots who have taken this profession only to earn their livelihood. They are as dangerous as snakes satiated with the wind” Thus, Charaka describes the common traits of fake doctors. They are unlearned and lack experience or knowledge of medicines and treatments. They will boast their skills before uneducated people. The principle advice of Charaka to ordinary people is to avoid a vaidya (physician) who shows off their knowledge. Avoid them like poisonous snakes.[3] Having warned against inviting their services, Charaka goes to describe the ignorance and hollowness of 201 these pretenders and how they avoid the presence and contact of the really learned physician, lest they be exposed. Charaka quoted how to find out the pseudo -physicians among other genuine ones: “Those who are not acquainted with the science as a whole or know it partially, gets frightened by the very sound of the medical scriptures, like the male bustards quails at the mere sound of the bow -string.”[4] “Taking advantage of the weakness of others any animal may play the wolf; but when it comes across a real wolf, its true nature is exposed. Similarly an ignorant individual, because of his garrulous nature tries to bully the ignorant ones, but he breaks down when a real scholar is met with. A man deprived of wisdom and knowledge of the science like an old babbru (large -brown mongoose) hidden in its own bristles (hairs) shrinks to speak anything in debates as a man of low -family does. Ignorant Individuals who are egoistic and garrulous usually speak too much, though with much of inconsistency.” Such is the case with pseudo - physicians. “Saintly individuals who are well versed in the science usually speak less, but what they say is relevant to the topic of discussion.”[5] “Those who are not well versed physician, resort to dogmatic views, take excuses for lack of time or sudden illness, try to show their ability by demonstrating books, equipments etc., use harsh and abusive language and speak ill of others during debates. These quacks are like noose of Kaala (god of death). They should therefore be shunned.[6] Considering the detailed description available in the texts, it seems that the ancient society also had a wholesome dread of medical quacks, and the ancient Acharyas have fulfilled their responsibility in this respect in a laudable measure. Quackery is one of the grave concerns for Ayurveda in current times. There should be rigorous regulations for punishing quacks who try to practice medicine/Ayurveda without proper learning and imperial licence. I would like to plea the ‘system’ makers, higher officials and common Ayurveda folks to wake up, as the main streamlining of Ayurvedic system of medicine is only possible after passing through the thicket of reforms, which Ayurveda needs severely.

Authors and Affiliations

Rohit Sharma, PK Prajapati

Keywords

Related Articles

Comparative physico-chemical validation between Arsenic-based Indian traditional drugs Haratal Bhasma and Rasamanikya

Background: Arsenic containing drugs Rasamanikya (RM) and Haratal Bhasma (HB) are used in Ayurveda for the treatment of several ailments. They are prepared from raw Haratal (RH) by the distinct Ayurvedic procedure. Hence...

An exploratory study on Shirisharishta with leaves as alternative for bark, wood and heartwood of Albizzia lebbeck Benth

Background: Lack of alternative part of use and unscientific harvesting are the two main causes for the medicinal plants becoming rare, endangered and threatened (RET). Now, there is a need to find out alternative part o...

In-silico studies in herbal drugs: A review

Bioinformatics is the latest technology in the research field. In-silico studies are done to identify the exact target of the drug. Which finds a drug for the particular binding site and final stage animal testing can be...

Review on Trisama- an unexplored ancient Ayurvedic formulation

Indian system of medicine has a longstanding history of using medicinal plants for the prevention and treatment of various health ailments. Trisama is an ancient Ayurvedic preparation can be prescribed for a wide range o...

An update review on Hibiscus rosa sinensis phytochemistry and medicinal uses

Hibiscus rosa sinensis is known as China rose belonging to the Malvaceae family. This plant has various important medicinal uses for treating wounds, inflamation, fever and coughs, diabetes, infections caused by bacteria...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP598396
  • DOI -
  • Views 53
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Rohit Sharma, PK Prajapati (2016). Historical insights on ‘Quacks’ in Ayurveda. Journal of Ayurvedic and Herbal Medicine, 2(6), 200-201. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-598396