How do collective defined contribution pension schemes qualify under the institutions for occupational retirement provisions ii directive
Journal Title: VUZF - Year 2019, Vol 1, Issue 2
Abstract
This article considers whether a collective defined contribution pension scheme (a “CDC scheme”) provides “cover against biometric risk” or “guarantees … a given level of benefits” for the purposes of Article 13(2) of EU Directive 2016/2341 (the “IORP II Directive”) or its predecessor, IORP I Directive (2003/41/EC), Article 15(2). If no such cover and no such guarantee are provided, then a CDC scheme is not required to comply with the technical provisions, buffer and other funding requirements applicable to an IORP which is classified as a “regulatory own fund” in Article 15 of the IORP II Directive. There is a linked, and for current practice, relevant issue: if a pension fund operates a CDC pension scheme that does not qualify as a regulatory own fund IORP, it would be classified as a “special investment fund” for EU VAT Directive purposes with the associated beneficial VAT treatment that is enjoyed by a retail collective investment scheme. Furthermore, this VAT treatment is available for all CDC schemes. The article explores this issue by reference to CDC schemes established in The Netherlands and against the background that the UK is planning to introduce legislation permitting CDC schemes to be established in the UK. The article compares some of the Dutch legislation regulating CDC schemes established in The Netherlands with the corresponding position in the UK in relation to the legal form used for a pension scheme, the protection of accrued rights under a pension scheme, the approach to funding defined benefit pension schemes (including, for this purpose, Dutch CDC schemes) and the different approaches to dealing with the insolvency of the employer in relation to a pension scheme (including the difference between the UK legislation for a Pension Protection Fund and The Netherlands not legislating for a pension protection fund). The article also notes that the essence of a CDC scheme is that the benefits are not guaranteed. Instead, the benefits are adjusted in accordance with legally binding rules which provide a mechanism for bringing the value of the target benefits back into line with the value of the assets of the scheme. The employer has no obligation to make any additional deficit repair contributions. The article notes that CDC schemes may also be referred to as Defined Ambition schemes or Target Benefit schemes.
Authors and Affiliations
Philip Bennett, Hans van Meerten
NFC (near field communication) at university
The administration of each university is of utmost importance because it passes through all the documentation. NFC is a wireless technology for high-speed data transfer over short distances. NFC is mostly used in public...
Institutional develoment and economic growth
The aim of this paper is to define some basic concepts, regulating the interrelationship between institutional development and economic growth. The main characteristics and traits of institutions are discussed. Also, the...
Amendments to the income taxes on natural persons act – 2019
The changes in the Income Taxeson Natural Persons Act /INPA/ which are in force since 1 January 2019 can be summarized in two main groups, depending on which tax periods will begin to apply. The first part examines the c...
Adequate and sustainable pensions - where is the balance between pay-as-you-go public pensions and capital pensions
In most countries of the European Union the population is ageing and there is a pressure on financing the current levels of pensions. Terms like “adequate” and “sustainable” are well perceived among politicians and resea...
The regulation of labor market in Ukraine
In this article it is described the process of labor force regulation, the specific of it and influence for the employment of population in Ukraine. We have analyzed state of market, functions and have proposed few ideas...