How job and family demands impact change in perceived stress: A dyadic study

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this two-wave study has been to test the spillover and crossover of job and family demands on changes in perceived stress at work and in the family. Specifically, we proposed that demands from one domain (work or family) spilled over to another domain through interrrole conflict (work–family/family–work conflict) and context-specific self-efficacy. Additionally, we hypothesized that changes in perceived stress were impacted not only by a person’s own demands through interrole conflict but also by the demands of one’s significant other, in the process of crossover. Material and Methods: The study was of dyadic design and it was conducted online, among 130 heterosexual couples, at 2 time points separated by 3 months interval. Hypotheses were verified by means of the path analysis. Results: No support was found for the spillover of job and family demands on changes in perceived stress through interrole conflict and self-efficacy, neither for women nor for men. With regard to the crossover, no support was found for the actor effects, i.e., a person’s demands did not impact changes in one’s own work- and family-related perceived stress but partial support was found for the partner effects, i.e., women’s job demands were associated with men’s changes in work and family-related stress through women’s work–family conflict, and men’s family demands were associated with women’s change in family-related perceived stress through men’s family–work conflict. Conclusions: The study is a longitudinal test of the Spillover–Crossover model and Work–Home Resources model demonstrating that job and family demands are transmitted across domains and across partners in the intimate relationships through the interrole conflict but the nature of this crossover is different for men and women. Int J Occup Med Environ Health 2018;31(2):199–215

Authors and Affiliations

Ewelina Smoktunowicz, Roman Cieślak

Keywords

Related Articles

Authors’ response (December 8, 2017) to the letter to the Editor concerning the paper “Occupational exposure to radon for underground tourist routes in Poland: Doses to lung and the risk of developing lung cancer”

Refers to: Mortazavi JSM, Bevelacqua JJ, Fornalski KW, Pennington CW, Welsh J, Janiak MK, et al. Letter to the editor (August 24, 2017) concerning the paper “Occupational exposure to radon for underground tourist routes...

Occupational exposure to electromagnetic fields in the Polish Armed Forces

Objectives: Standard devices used by military personnel that may pose electromagnetic hazard include: radars, missile systems, radio navigation systems and radio transceivers. The aim of this study has been to evaluate t...

Authors’ response (November 28, 2017) to the letter to the Editor concerning the paper “Screening commercial drivers for obstructive sleep apnea: Validation of STOP-Bang questionnaire”

Refers to: Kawada T. Letter to the Editor (November 15, 2017) concerning the paper “Screening commercial drivers for obstructive sleep apnea: Validation of STOP-Bang questionnaire”. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2018;3...

Cytostatics as hazardous chemicals in healthcare workers’ environment

Cytostatics not only induce significant side-effects in patients treated oncologically but also pose a threat to the health of occupationally exposed healthcare workers: pharmacists, physicians, nurses and other personne...

Duration of breastfeeding and psychomotor development in 1-year-old children – Polish Mother and Child Cohort Study

Objectives: The objective of this study was to evaluate the association between breastfeeding duration and child neurodevelopment based on the Polish Mother and Child Cohort Study. Material and Methods: The current analy...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP272584
  • DOI 10.13075/ijomeh.1896.01134
  • Views 72
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Ewelina Smoktunowicz, Roman Cieślak (2018). How job and family demands impact change in perceived stress: A dyadic study. International Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health, 31(2), 199-215. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-272584