How many calories were in those hamburgers again? Distribution density biases recall of attribute values

Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2014, Vol 7, Issue 3

Abstract

Decisions that consumers make often rest on evaluations of attributes, such as how large, expensive, good, or fattening an option seems. Extant research has demonstrated that these evaluations in turn depend upon the recently experienced distribution of attribute values (e.g., positively or negatively skewed). In many situations decisions rely on recalling the attribute values of each option, a process that has been neglected in much of the previous literature. In two experiments, participants learned attribute information for labeled stimuli presented within either a positively or negatively skewed distribution and then they recalled values from labels after approximately one minute. The results demonstrated effects that are inconsistent with predictions of the category-adjustment model (Duffy, Huttenlocher, Hedges & Crawford, 2010) that recalled values would shift toward the mean of the distribution of values presented. Instead, results were consistent with predictions of the comparison-induced distortion model (Choplin & Hummel, 2002) that remembered values would depend on the density of stimuli within the attribute range. Reasons for these results, alternative models, and implications for decision-making are discussed.

Authors and Affiliations

Jessica M. Choplin and Douglas H. Wedell

Keywords

Related Articles

Further evidence for the memory state heuristic: Recognition latency predictions for binary inferences

According to the recognition heuristic (RH), for decision domains where recognition is a valid predictor of a choice criterion, recognition alone is used to make inferences whenever one object is recognized and the other...

Time preference and its relationship with age, health, and survival probability

Although theories from economics and evolutionary biology predict that one’s age, health, and survival probability should be associated with one’s subjective discount rate (SDR), few studies have empirically tested for t...

Criteria for performance evaluation

Using a cognitive task (mental calculation) and a perceptual-motor task (stylized golf putting), we examined differential proficiency using the CWS index and several other quantitative measures of performance. The CWS in...

Limited resources or limited luck? Why people perceive an illusory negative correlation between the outcomes of choice options despite unequivocal evidence for independence

When people learn of the outcome of an option they did not choose (the alternative outcome) before they know their own outcome, they see an illusory negative correlation between the two outcomes, the Alternative Omen Eff...

Order effects in the results of song contests: Evidence from the Eurovision and the New Wave

The results of song contests offer a unique opportunity to analyze possible distortions arising from various biases in performance evaluations using observational data. In this study we investigate the influence of conte...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP678126
  • DOI -
  • Views 155
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Jessica M. Choplin and Douglas H. Wedell (2014). How many calories were in those hamburgers again? Distribution density biases recall of attribute values. Judgment and Decision Making, 7(3), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-678126