How well do Parent, Clinician and objective Measures of Hyperactivity in the Office Correlate with Actigraph Measures at Home and at School in Typically Developing Controls and Children Evaluated for ADHD?

Journal Title: Psychology & Psychological Research International Journal - Year 2017, Vol 2, Issue 1

Abstract

Clinicians evaluating children for ADHD frequently rely on parental reports and their own impressions in assessing hyperactivity. However, it is well known that parental ratings only correlate modestly with teacher ratings. An alternative means of assessing hyperactivity in the office are test that use motion tracking devices to quantify how much children fidget during a cognitive control attention task (e.g. QuotientTM ADHD System™). We sought to ascertain whether clinician, parent and office-based objective measures correlated with hourly levels of activity assessed over 3-5 school days by belt-worn actigraphs in 83 un medicated children (10.6±3.1 years), including 15 typically developing controls and 68 being evaluated for ADHD. Overall, there was no significant correlation between clinician ratings of hyperactivity and actigraph measures at any time. Parent ratings only correlated with actigraph measures at 6-7 AM. In contrast, the QuotientTM Hyperactivity Index correlated with actigraph measures at 9-12AM, 1-3, 4-5, and 6-9 PM. Parent and clinician ratings were highly correlated with each other but only correlated modestly with the QuotientTM Hyperactivity Index (r = 0.318 and 0.298, respectively, both p < 0.01). Hyperactivity, as an objectively quantifiable sign of psychopathology was not well captured by parent or clinician ratings. Likely, this is due to parents and clinicians focusing not only on levels of movement or difficulty sitting still but also on the intrusiveness of the behavior. This may lead to false negative evaluations in children who fidget less intrusively and to false positive evaluations in children with oppositional or disruptive behaviors.

Authors and Affiliations

Kyoko Ohashi

Keywords

Related Articles

Asymmetry in the Judgment of Facial Attributes in Neutral Left and Right Hemifaces

This study examined the phenomenon of facial asymmetry in the judgment of facial attributes during neutral expression. Eighty right handed male undergraduate students were asked to rate the intensity of emotion, healthin...

Behavioral Effects, Cognitive Effects, and the Physiology of Marijuana Use

Marijuana is one of the most abused and misunderstood illicit drugs in many countries including the United States [1]. Since the 1960s, marijuana use has steadily increased over the years particularly among teenagers and...

Nutrient Depletion-Induced Neuro-Chemical Disorder (Brain Hunger) as a Basic Factor of Psychopathology

The prevalence of psychopathology as well as its incidence points to the need of generating different and more integrative methods of research and treatment that include the nutritional aspects of mental health. Therefor...

Gene Environment Interaction–A White Elephant? or An Elephant in the Room?

Genomic information can be considered as “codes” which can’t be altered throughout the lifespan1. With the advent of Genome wide association studies (GWAS), the gene-environment interaction is gaining importance in corre...

Relationship between Behavior Aggressive and the of Accented Character of Adolescent

Aggressive behaviour is a part of the general family education, on the other hand it reveals, according to some prominent character traits, that it is formed throughout life. In this study we examined the interaction bet...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP332120
  • DOI -
  • Views 108
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Kyoko Ohashi (2017). How well do Parent, Clinician and objective Measures of Hyperactivity in the Office Correlate with Actigraph Measures at Home and at School in Typically Developing Controls and Children Evaluated for ADHD?. Psychology & Psychological Research International Journal, 2(1), 1-9. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-332120