How well do Parent, Clinician and objective Measures of Hyperactivity in the Office Correlate with Actigraph Measures at Home and at School in Typically Developing Controls and Children Evaluated for ADHD?

Journal Title: Psychology & Psychological Research International Journal - Year 2017, Vol 2, Issue 1

Abstract

Clinicians evaluating children for ADHD frequently rely on parental reports and their own impressions in assessing hyperactivity. However, it is well known that parental ratings only correlate modestly with teacher ratings. An alternative means of assessing hyperactivity in the office are test that use motion tracking devices to quantify how much children fidget during a cognitive control attention task (e.g. QuotientTM ADHD System™). We sought to ascertain whether clinician, parent and office-based objective measures correlated with hourly levels of activity assessed over 3-5 school days by belt-worn actigraphs in 83 un medicated children (10.6±3.1 years), including 15 typically developing controls and 68 being evaluated for ADHD. Overall, there was no significant correlation between clinician ratings of hyperactivity and actigraph measures at any time. Parent ratings only correlated with actigraph measures at 6-7 AM. In contrast, the QuotientTM Hyperactivity Index correlated with actigraph measures at 9-12AM, 1-3, 4-5, and 6-9 PM. Parent and clinician ratings were highly correlated with each other but only correlated modestly with the QuotientTM Hyperactivity Index (r = 0.318 and 0.298, respectively, both p < 0.01). Hyperactivity, as an objectively quantifiable sign of psychopathology was not well captured by parent or clinician ratings. Likely, this is due to parents and clinicians focusing not only on levels of movement or difficulty sitting still but also on the intrusiveness of the behavior. This may lead to false negative evaluations in children who fidget less intrusively and to false positive evaluations in children with oppositional or disruptive behaviors.

Authors and Affiliations

Kyoko Ohashi

Keywords

Related Articles

Why Medicine is No Longer a Profession

The enemy of health care (and practically everything else) is bureaucracy. Health care is neither the purpose nor the function of the Health Insurance Industry (HII). Contemporary medical care is no longer part of “the A...

The Efficacy of Brief Intervention Plus Telephone Booster for Alcohol with Depression Out-Patients

Objective: Alcohol and comorbid depression commonly occur in patients with alcohol hazardous use. Psychological therapies are required in the treatment and prevention of alcohol abuse. The purpose of this study was to ev...

Understanding the Power of Hope and Meaning: Lessons Learned from Religion and Mysticism

Studies have shown that people are more willing to seek out a mystic healer or rely on religion and spirituality for healing than engage in psychotherapy. Accordingly, it is important that mental health practitioners bet...

The Hero beyond the Mask: Discussing Children’s Referential Problems in Literary and Audiovisual Texts

The main objective of this article is to discuss critically children’s referential problems in literary and audiovisual texts. As many know children’s intuitive age group (4-8 y.o.) present a unique developmental feature...

Benefits of Vitamins C and E in Sensorineural Hearing Loss

Introduction: Sensorineural hearing loss is a growing problem tends and has been associated with toxic effects of free radicals such as reactive oxygen species and nitric oxide in the auditory system. With this in mind,...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP332120
  • DOI -
  • Views 113
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Kyoko Ohashi (2017). How well do Parent, Clinician and objective Measures of Hyperactivity in the Office Correlate with Actigraph Measures at Home and at School in Typically Developing Controls and Children Evaluated for ADHD?. Psychology & Psychological Research International Journal, 2(1), 1-9. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-332120