Hub-and-spoke cartel – how to assess horizontal collusion in disguise?

Journal Title: Krytyka Prawa. Niezależne studia nad prawem - Year 2016, Vol 8, Issue 2

Abstract

The increased effectiveness of competition law enforcement has contributed to the appearance of an atypical type of cartel, which engages not only competitors, but also their common supplier (or retailer). The so called hub-and-spoke cartel consists in the exchange of strategic information between two or more horizontal competitors (spokes) via a common contractual partner active at a different level of the production/distribution chain (the hub), who often also contributes to stabilizing a cartel. Due to the existence of the vertical element of this indirect information exchange, the question arises whether it should be assessed in the same way as its direct equivalent, i.e. as a “by-object” restriction of competition, thus, not requiring an analysis of its actual effects. Although the EU institutions have not adjudicated a hub-and-spoke collusion case yet, the jurisprudence of the national courts may provide useful guidance on what the constituent elements of the hub-and-spoke collusion are and how to assess this practice under the EU competition law. The analysis of both national and EU case law allows to contend that the hub-and-spoke cartels should amount to de facto horizontal information exchange and be assessed in accordance with the “by-object” standard. However, the hub-and-spoke collusion may equally constitute a part of a normal negotiation process (e.g. bargaining) with trading partners, as well as give rise to several efficiency gains, which should be taken into account in examining the practice concerned under the EU competition law.<br/><br/>

Authors and Affiliations

Iga Małobęcka

Keywords

Related Articles

Transparency of states’ obligations in the area of arms trade. Legal issues

The purpose of this paper is to answer how the issue of transparency has been dealt with in the Arms Trade Treaty. Analysed provisions will also be assesed. As a point of reference other instruments regarding arms trade...

Creative interpretation of lex Rhodia de iactu in the legal doctrine of ius commune

Among the institutions adopted from Roman law whose historical evolution within ius commune is particularly interesting, it is worth pointing out the issues connected with the distribution of damage incurred as a result...

Populistyczny konstytucjonalizm czy nowy konstytucjonalizm?

Tekst próbuje bronić tezę, że obecnie jesteśmy w momencie wykluwania się nowych rozwiązań konstytucyjnych. Ruchy populistyczne na świecie, a w szczególności w Europie Środkowo-Wschodniej, dokonują efektywnego przeprojekt...

[b][i]Does Modern Democracy Have the Instruments to Defend Itself? Based on the Israel Example[/i][/b]

The “classical” democracies of the Western world showed a weakness towards totalitarian systems. The Weimar Constitution of Germany enabled Hitler to gain power. Turkey, as a result of Atatürk’s heritage, defends itself...

Człowiekowi, który za życia nie upora się z życiem – o „Procesie” Franza Kafki

Powieść Franza Kafki Proces to powieść ponadczasowa, wciąż aktualna i żywa. Stanowi zapis stanu świadomości określonej epoki, pewnego poglądu na świat autora, o zniewoleniu człowieka przez panujące prawo, bowiem władza d...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP210573
  • DOI 10.7206/kp.2080-1084.110
  • Views 88
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Iga Małobęcka (2016). Hub-and-spoke cartel – how to assess horizontal collusion in disguise?. Krytyka Prawa. Niezależne studia nad prawem, 8(2), 64-78. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-210573