Hypofractionated radiotherapy in breast cancer: Is it safe?

Abstract

Introduction: Radiation therapy has gained an established role in the treatment of breast cancer either as chest wall irradiation after modified radical mastectomy, or as whole breast irradiation after a breast conserving surgery (BCS). For patients with resectable tumour undergoing mastectomy, radiation therapy to chest wall and regional lymph nodes to a total dose of 5000-6000 cGy is usually employed. The aim of the present study was to assess a hypofractionated RT regimen of 42.5Gy/16#/3wks versus the conventional RT regimen of 50Gy/25#/5wks in post mastectomy patients of breast cancer in our institute and to compare the acute and late toxicities as well as effectiveness with conventional method. Materials and methods: Thirty women of breast cancer, who were post mastectomy were assigned to receive 42.5 Gy/ 16#/3wks and for comparison, a group of 30 patients with similar characteristics were treated with conventional fractionation and received 50 Gy/25#/5 wks. Results: The grade 2 and 3 skin toxicity in group A was 13.33% and 10% respectively. Grade 4 toxicity was not seen. group B had grade 2 in 6.7% patients. No patient had grade 3 and 4 toxicity in group B. Grade 1 lymphoedema was seen in 53%, grade 2 in 30% and grade 3 in 6.7% patients in group A and 53%, 20% and 16.7% in group B respectively. On HRCT, chest for lung toxicity, group A had ground glass appearance in 3.4% patients, pleural thickness in 10.4% and septal lines, linear opacifications and subpleural opacities were seen in 58.6% patients. In group B, it was 6.7%, 13.3% and 36.7% respectively. Conclusion: The hypofractionated protocol can be safely used as the toxicities and effectiveness are comparable to the conventional radiotherapy in post mastectomy breast cancer patients. Hypofractionated radiotherapy was cost effective and more convenient to the patients as the use of 16 fractions (instead of 25), saves 900 treatment sessions per 100 patients (2500-1600=900). This corresponds to an additional number of 56 (900:16) patients that could be treated by the same number of fractions.

Authors and Affiliations

Neeru Bedi, Hanuman Prasad Yadav, RPS Banipal, Simmi Agarwal, Yashna Gupta

Keywords

Related Articles

Creativity of Beauty with Creating Dimple – Review

Body modifications are now a day most common in place,face-lifts, lip modification etc,. Plastic surgery is not a new thing. People have been getting nipped and tucked for so many years. Dimples are small visible indenta...

Evaluation Of Prevalence Of Cutaneous Lesions Of Lichen Planus In Patients Visiting A Tertiary Care Center: A Clinical Study

Background: Lichen planus (LP) is a chronic inflammatory and immune mediated disease. The exact aetiology and epidemiology of LP is uncertain. Hence; on the basis of above mentioned data, we planned the present study to...

Study To Assess Perception And Need Assessment Of Sex Education Among School Going Adolescents

Background:t is a period of transition from childhood to adulthood, a period of dramatic growth and development. As a child evolves into an adult, a complex myriad of physiological as well as psychological alterations ta...

Assessment of Cases of Acute Pancreatitis - A Clinical Study

Background: Acute pancreatitis is a common condition presenting as acute abdomen. The present study was conducted to assess patients of SAP. Materials & Methods: The present study was conducted on 24 cases of both gender...

Comparative study between FM Staining and Z-N Staining In Diagnosing Sputum Smear Positive PTB

Introduction:- Pulmonary tuberculosis is a disease of the respiratory system, caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Tuberculosis is a predominant infectious cause of mortality today. According to World Health Organizatio...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP492620
  • DOI -
  • Views 126
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Neeru Bedi, Hanuman Prasad Yadav, RPS Banipal, Simmi Agarwal, Yashna Gupta (2018). Hypofractionated radiotherapy in breast cancer: Is it safe?. Harsukh Educational Charitable Society International Journal of Community Health and Medical Research, 4(4), 47-53. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-492620