I-Gel and Classic LMA - a Comparitive Study in Anaesthetized and Paralyzed Patients
Journal Title: International Journal of Anesthesiology & Research (IJAR) - Year 2015, Vol 3, Issue 5
Abstract
This study was undertaken in 50 ASA 1 and 2 patients of age group 18 to 60 years undergoing elective surgeries of short duration. Patients were randomly divided into 2 groups of 25 each for i-gel and classic LMA. Parameters assessed were - ease of insertion of airway device i.e. no. of attempts required and time taken for effective airway establishment (TFEA), ease of gastric tube placement, gastric insufflation and regurgitation (by comparing pH of the secretions on the dorsal surface of both the devices with sensitive litmus paper), hemodynamic response to insertion of device and post-operative sore throat following general anaesthesia. Incidents like desaturation, laryngospasm, bronchospasm, gastric insufflations were noted. The mode of induction, maintenance and reversal of general anaesthesia remained the same for both the groups. Demographic data between the two groups i.e. age, weight, sex, duration of surgery was comparable and with no statistical difference between them. There was one incidence of failure of insertion with Classic LMA to achieve effective airway. Success rate of device insertion was higher for i-gel than classic LMA and was statistically significant. Mean attempt for i-gel was 1.12 (S.D 0.332), classic LMA 1.45 (S.D 0.588). Time required for effective airway establishment was shorter with i-gel 20.24 seconds (S.D 22.408) than classic LMA 52.458 (S.D 41.341) and was statistically significant P < 0.05. There were no statistical and clinical differences in hemodynamic responses to insertion of both the devices. After removal at the end of surgery blood was visible on cuffs of 3 Classic LMAs but not on any of the i-gels. No statistical difference was found in pH of the cuffs of both the devices after removal. Incidence of post-operative sore throat was more with classic LMA (mean rank 31.25) than i-gel (mean rank 19) and was statistically significant P < 0.05. To conclude i-gel is easier to insert than Classic LMA and also facilitates gastric tube placement. i-gel is appropriate device for airway management as an alternative or backup device to Classic LMA. i-gel is less traumatic to airway than Classic LMA and correctly positioned i-gel isolates glottis from upper esophagus and provides airway protection.
Authors and Affiliations
Kunal Joshi
Retrospective Assessment Of Postoperative Pain Control With Intravenous Or Epidural Patient-Controlled Analgesia After Orthopedic, General And Plastic Surgery
Aim: Patient-controlled analgesia methods are more effective than conventional analgesia methods for the management of postoperative pain. Patient-controlled analgesia is often preferred as it has less sedative effect, m...
Laparoscopic Guided Transversus Abdominus Plane (Tap) Block – A Modified Technique
We present a modified laparoscopic technique to administer quick and effective Tansversesus Abdominus Plane (TAP) block. The technique combines the benefit of laparoscopic guidance along with the knowledge of radiologica...
Does Endotracheal Tube Design Affect Cuff Seal, Safety and Subglottic Suction Performance: An in-vitro study?
Introduction: Ideally endotracheal tubes (ETT) should protect the airways without causing pressure induced tissue damage. Traditionally, the addition of a tracheal cuff was heralded as seal against aspiration. This type...
A Study Of Comparison Of 0.8mg Vs 1.4mg Of Intrathecal Nalbuphine In 3.5ml Of Inj. Bupivacaine Heavy 0.5% In Lower Abdominal And Lower Limb Surgeries
Background: Spinal anaesthesia is a commonly employed technique which provides safe, effective, low cost surgical anesthesia with good post-operative analgesia. Nalbuphine is a semi synthetic opioid with mixed antagonist...
Laparoscopic Surgeries during Pregnancy - Related Anaesthetic Concerns
Pregnancy is no longer considered a contraindication to laparoscopic surgery. The advantages include less exposure of the fetus to possibly toxic agents, smaller incisions, decreased pain, less need for analgesics, more...