Identifying the Impact of RMB and SDG Exchange Rate Variability on the Trade Value between China and Sudan (1986-2012)

Journal Title: International Journal of Financial Economics - Year 2014, Vol 2, Issue 3

Abstract

This paper applies augmented gravity equation model on the bilateral Chinese Sudanese trade flows. The estimation covers total export and import in addition to ten export goods groups and eight import goods groups in Standard International Trade Classification(SITC) Revision 1 (Riv.1)‎for 27 years (1986-2012).The model after correction includes the two-country exchange rate and GDP and the suggested Technological Distance (TDIS) between them in fourteen different data sets. The aim of this study is to investigate how exchange rates variability of the Chinese currency (RMB) and Sudanese currency(SDG)affect the bilateral trade flows between China and Sudan. The results indicate that at total level: RMB and SDG exchange rate variability has no any statistically significant impact on export or import, as well as the case for TDIS. China’s GDP is statistically significant and has positive impact on export and import addition to that it considered as the major determinant for trade flow value. Sudan’s GDP is statistically significant and has positive impact on export and import. However, Sudan’s GDP play less role as determinant for trade flow value comparatively with China’s GDP. At SITC export goods group’s level, the results indicate that: RMB exchange rate variability has statistically positive significant impact on export group’s value in 27.5% of the estimated equations and there is no any negative significant impact for it. SDG exchange rate variability has statistically positive significant impact on export group’s value in 10 % of the estimated equations; there is no any negative significant impact for it. While at SITC import goods group’s level, the results indicate that: RMB exchange rate variability has positive statistically significant impact in 34 % of the estimated equations and there is no any negative significant impact for it. SDG exchange rate variability has no any statistically significant impact on import group’s value.

Authors and Affiliations

Megdam Khalil Ibrahim Khalil, Li Xiumin

Keywords

Related Articles

Impact of Investment on Stock Market Development in Nigeria

This paper empirically examined the impact of investment on stock market development in Nigeria from 2001-2010. Investment was proxy by gross fixed capital formation and stock market development proxy by market capital...

Affection of Estimated Depreciation Rate on Decreased Sharing Machine Contract in Islamic Banks.

This study is one of very few studies which have investigated affection of estimated depreciation rates on decreased sharing machine contract. As result to study, there are many expecting depreciation rates for same ma...

Investigating the Long time Memory in the Future Market of Gold

This paper concentrates on investigating the long memory property of the gold future markets in the United States. The data set consists of daily future prices, and long memory tests based on ARFIMA with use of three qu...

Financing Third World Development: Perspective of the African Development Bank (AfDB)

This paper provides an exposition on African Development Bank (AfDB) Group financial engagements to member countries in the form of loans, grants and equity participation using incidence analysis. Over Unit of Account...

An Empirical Analysis between Banking Sector Development and Growth Rate of GDP in Bangladesh

The objective of this research is to investigate the impact of banking sector development on economic growth in Bangladesh over the year 1990-2011. In this research, we have used five different explanatory variables by...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP27345
  • DOI -
  • Views 295
  • Downloads 8

How To Cite

Megdam Khalil Ibrahim Khalil, Li Xiumin (2014). Identifying the Impact of RMB and SDG Exchange Rate Variability on the Trade Value between China and Sudan (1986-2012). International Journal of Financial Economics, 2(3), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-27345