IMMUNITY AND LENIENCY POLICY IN COMPETITION CASES

Abstract

It is fully known that the premises for market economics resides on free competition. In other words, market player must make all the necessary efforts in order to obtain the desired results on their own, through business innovation and increased efficiency. In order to protect this, the competition primary and secondary legislation is carefully tailored to such needs, supporting and protecting the internal market from the companies’ tendency to distort competition. As such, competition law offers the companies’ involved in anticompetitive agreements methods to either waive the entire fine or to diminish it considerably. The aim is to encourage companies to bring upfront anticompetitive agreements that aim to distort competition and free market, thus protecting the internal market. The competition law itself does not pursue to sanction players that acted in an anticompetitive manner, but to prevent such behavior, because prevention is more important than reducing the effects afterwards. In the present paper we aim to make a radiography of the methods of eliminating or reducing a fine that a company have in our national law when it comes to anticompetitive agreements.

Authors and Affiliations

Ana-Maria UDRISTE, Adelina VOICU

Keywords

Related Articles

WORLD MERCHANDISE TRADE

This article is mainly based on the most recent statistical data of the World Trade Organization and some aspects related to the evolution of world merchandise trade, in terms of volume and value, in 2015. The volume of...

TRENDS IN INTERNATIONAL TAX PLANNING: NEW QUALIFICATIONS AND TAX JURISDICTION SHOPPING

In 2015 the unprecedented leak of 11,5 million files from Mossack Fonseka, one of the world’s biggest offshore law firms, echoed around the globe after demonstrating variety of sophisticated ways in which the wealthy can...

SHORT REFLECTIONS REGARDING PRECAUTIONARY AND PREVENTIVE MEASURES ORDERED IN THE CRIMINAL TRIAL AGAINST AN INSOLVENT LEGAL PERSON

The judicial realities have shown us that the field of the precautionary and preventive measures ruled in the criminal trial against the insolvent judicial person is not correctly and efficiently regulated. There are a s...

MOTIVATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE ACTS – GUARANTEE OF GOOD ADMINISTRATION

The present article deals with the aspects of motivating administrative acts, both doctrinaire and practical, of jurisprudence. The duty of the administration to motivate its decisions is submitted in the Charter of Fund...

PLAGIARISM AND SCHOOL WITH ITS “SINS”

The paper aims to highlight those aspects of education that hinder the development of autonomous and creative personality (focusing on students) and that favour”germ” plagiarism. In addition, the present paper offers sug...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP297357
  • DOI -
  • Views 121
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Ana-Maria UDRISTE, Adelina VOICU (2017). IMMUNITY AND LENIENCY POLICY IN COMPETITION CASES. Challenges of the knowledge society ( Provocari ale societatii cunoasterii ), 9(11), 312-320. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-297357