Impact of the United States propofol ban on emergency providers' procedural sedation agent choice and patient length of stay

Journal Title: World Journal of Emergency Medicine - Year 2012, Vol 3, Issue 3

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the recent past, propofol was temporarily removed from the emergency department (ED) for use in procedural sedation. We sought to determine which agents replaced it in clinical practice and the impact this change had on turnaround times (TAT) for sedated patients. METHODS: This study is a retrospective chart review at a level one trauma center. Patients receiving sedative agents (propofol, ketamine, midazolam, and etomidate) were identified by pharmacy codes, and their charts were then reviewed for demographics and TAT. Propofol was unavailable in the emergency department (ED) between May 2010 and February 2011. The study period extended from May 2009 until May 2011. Patients receiving sedation by non-emergency medicine physicians and those receiving sedation related to intubation were excluded. RESULTS: In total 2466 charts were reviewed and 209 met inclusion criteria. When propofol was available, the most commonly used sedative agent was etomidate (40%), followed by propofol (28%), ketamine (20%), and midazolam (6%). When propofol was unavailable, etomidate remained the most commonly used agent (43%), followed by ketamine (41%), and midazolam (11%). When propofol was available, the median TAT for sedated patients was 163 minutes compared to 178 minutes when propofol was unavailable (P=0.83). When propofol was the primary sedative agent used, the median TAT was 166 minutes as compared with a median TAT of 172 minutes for all other sedative agents combined (P=0.87). CONCLUSION: When propofol was unavailable, ketamine became a preferred ED sedation agent. Removal of propofol from the sedation armamentarium did not affect ED TAT.

Authors and Affiliations

Keywords

Related Articles

Emergency department operations and management education in emergency medicine training

BACKGROUND: This study was undertaken to examine the current level of operations and management education within US-based Emergency Medicine Residency programs. METHODS: Residency program directors at all US-based Emerge...

The reliability of the Australasian Triage Scale: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Although the Australasian Triage Scale (ATS) has been developed two decades ago, its reliability has not been defined; therefore, we present a meta-analysis of the reliability of the ATS in order to reveal to...

Rapid sequence induction (RSI) in trauma patients:Insights from healthcare providers

BACKGROUND: We aimed to describe the current practice of emergency physicians and anaesthesiologists in the selection of drugs for rapid-sequence induction (RSI) among trauma patients. METHODS: A prospective survey audit...

Application of bedside continuous blood purification in patients with multiple organ dysfunction syndromes

BACKGROUND: The complications of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) include acute lung injury, acute kidney injury, shock, and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS). In recent years, how to clear inflamm...

TRAF6 polymorphisms not associated with the susceptibility to and severity of sepsis in a Chinese population

BACKGROUND: The tumor necrosis factor recepter associated factor (TRAF) 6 is an important intracellular adapter protein that plays a pivotal role in activating multiple inflammatory and immune related processes induced b...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP472821
  • DOI -
  • Views 67
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

(2012). Impact of the United States propofol ban on emergency providers' procedural sedation agent choice and patient length of stay. World Journal of Emergency Medicine, 3(3), 177-181. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-472821