IMPORTANCE OF GRANTING TO THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF GEORGIA THE AUTHORITY OF CONSIDERING THE “REALISTIC” CONSTITUTIONAL APPEALS

Journal Title: The Copernicus Journal of Political Studies - Year 2016, Vol 0, Issue 2

Abstract

On the basis of the current legislation in relation to the issues of the second chapter of the Constitution (Human rights), the Constitutional Court of Georgia considers only the issue of the constitutionality of the content of normative acts and considers the appeals as inadmissible where the violation of rights is derived not from the content of the norm but its misuse in practice. This approach extends as well to those cases when the violation of a person’s rights is caused by incorrect interpretation of the norm by the court and improper use in the process of legal correlation. The Georgian Legislation does not grant to the Constitutional Court the authority to consider the indicated issue. The indicated issue is a legal problem to the extent that the initial point of the democratic states is to defend the human rights and correspondingly, the primary goal of the constitutional control should be the restoration of the human rights violated by the state structures (authorities). However, the recent precedential law gives us a possibility to make the conclusion that the General Courts in a number of cases define the law contrary to the Constitution, and the Constitutional law is powerless to restore the right of the person whose right was violated by the action of the judge of the court. The aim of this article is to analyze advantages and disadvantages of real-life constitutional appeals and prove importance of granting to the Constitutional Court of Georgia the authority of considering the “realistic” constitutional appeals.

Authors and Affiliations

Ana Kuchukhidze

Keywords

Related Articles

CULTURAL DIPLOMACY AS A TOOL OF UKRAINE’S FOREIGN POLICY: ACHIEVEMENTS AND CHALLENGES

This article reveals the essence of cultural diplomacy as a foreign policy vector, and discusses its place among the tools of public diplomacy. The focus lies on the analysis of cultural diplomacy potential in Ukrainian...

THE EU’S EASTERN PARTNERSHIP IN THE SOUTH CAUCASUS: USING GEORGIA AS A MODEL TO UNDERSTAND REFORMS AND SECURITY CHALLENGES

The main goal of the Eastern Partnership (EaP) is political and economic stabilization of the region threatened both by its post-Soviet systemic predicaments such as weakness of state institutions, the gap between the ru...

COMMUNICATION POLICY AS THE SOURCE OF CITIZENS’ TRUST

The article focuses on the national dimensions of the EU communication policy in Sweden, Finland and Denmark. The cornerstone of the EU communication policy is the dialogue with citizens about the policies and the future...

SOCIAL MANDATE FOR POLISH LEGISLATIVE AND EXECUTIVE POWER CENTRAL ORGANS IN THE FACE OF CHALLENGES THAT AWAIT THE EU. THE QUESTION OF FOR PUBLIC PARTICIPATION

Due to amalgamation of Polish and EU systems, the shape of many public policies in the country is the consequence of decisions taken within the EU – but what is more important – with participation of Poles. Complexity of...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP500972
  • DOI 10.12775/CJPS.2016.012
  • Views 53
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Ana Kuchukhidze (2016). IMPORTANCE OF GRANTING TO THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF GEORGIA THE AUTHORITY OF CONSIDERING THE “REALISTIC” CONSTITUTIONAL APPEALS. The Copernicus Journal of Political Studies, 0(2), 75-90. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-500972