In Silico Evaluation of the Potential Impact of Bioanalytical Bias Difference between Two Therapeutic Protein Formulations for Pharmacokinetic Assessment in a Biocomparability Study

Journal Title: The AAPS Journal - Year 2015, Vol 17, Issue 3

Abstract

Formulation changes at later stages of biotherapeutics development require biocomparability (BC) assessment. Using simulation, this study aims to determine the potential effect of bias difference observed between the two formulations after spiking into serum in passing or failing of a critical BC study. An ELISA method with 20% total error was used to assess any bias differences between a reference (RF) and test formulations (TF) in serum. During bioanalytical comparison of these formulations, a 9% difference in bias was observed between the two formulations in sera. To determine acceptable level of bias difference between the RF and TF bioanalytically, two in silico simulations were performed. The in silico analysis showed that the likelihood of the study meeting the BC criteria was >90% when the bias difference between RF and TF in serum was 9% and the number of subjects was ≥20 per treatment arm. An additional simulation showed that when the bias difference was increased to 13% and the number of subjects was <40, the likelihood of meeting the BC criteria decreased to 80%. The result from in silico analysis allowed the bioanalytical laboratory to proceed with sample analysis using a single calibrator and quality controls made from the reference formulation. This modeling approach can be applied to other BC studies with similar situations.

Authors and Affiliations

Theingi M. Thway, Chris Macaraeg, Michael Eschenberg, Mark Ma

Keywords

Related Articles

Large Molecule Specific Assay Operation: Recommendation for Best Practices and Harmonization from the Global Bioanalysis Consortium Harmonization Team

The L2 Global Harmonization Team on large molecule specific assay operation for protein bioanalysis in support of pharmacokinetics focused on the following topics: setting up a balanced validation design, specificity tes...

Antitumor Activity of Gemcitabine Can Be Potentiated in Pancreatic Cancer through Modulation of TLR4/NF-κB signaling by 6-Shogaol

The online version of this article (doi:10.1208/s12248-013-9558-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Peptide Kappa Opioid Receptor Ligands: Potential for Drug Development

While narcotic analgesics such as morphine, which act preferentially through mu opioid receptors, remain the gold standard in the treatment of severe pain, their use is limited by detrimental liabilities such as respirat...

Maltodextrin-based proniosomes

Niosomes are nonionic surfactant vesicles that have potential applications in the delivery of hydrophobic or amphiphilic drugs. Our lab developed proniosomes, a dry formulation using a sorbitol carrier coated with nonion...

Structure–Activity Relationships of Tariquidar Analogs as Multidrug Resistance Modulators

The review summarizes the most recent achievements in structure–activity relationship (SAR) studies of tariquidar and its analogs. Tariquidar is one of the most promising representatives of the third generation o...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP680954
  • DOI  10.1208/s12248-015-9741-9
  • Views 50
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Theingi M. Thway, Chris Macaraeg, Michael Eschenberg, Mark Ma (2015). In Silico Evaluation of the Potential Impact of Bioanalytical Bias Difference between Two Therapeutic Protein Formulations for Pharmacokinetic Assessment in a Biocomparability Study. The AAPS Journal, 17(3), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-680954