India’s Foreign Trade with China Since Economic Reforms in India

Journal Title: JOURNAL OF COMMERCE AND TRADE - Year 2017, Vol 9, Issue 1

Abstract

The comparison of the key features of trade integration processes and the economic outcomes in China and India reveals that while much has already been achieved in both these economies, the Chinese reforms, especially with respect to manufacturing trade, have gone further and that this is likely one of the key determinants of better economic performance of China. Still, China’s integration process so far remains characterized by a certain duality. On the one hand the opening up of trade and FDI in manufactured goods has spurred the emergence of a largely private sector. On the other hand the high level of public ownership and important regulatory barriers continue to dominate the services sectors. India has gone a long way in reducing its tariffs on non-agricultural products as well as selected non-tariff barriers but moderate protection still persists which likely adds to the hurdles faced by the Indian manufacturing sector. India has revealed a comparative advantage in certain segments of the services sector but its services trade policy is still very restrictive, even as compared to China. More generally the extent of liberalisation achieved so far in India and the outcomes it brought about suggest that the remaining goods and services trade barriers are just but one item on the list of reforms that India needs to tackle in order to promote trade-led expansion of more labour-intensive activities. India has gone a long way in reducing its tariffs on non-agricultural products as well as certain non-tariff barriers but moderate protection still persists which likely adds to the costs of intermediate inputs and, thus, to the hurdles faced by the Indian manufacturing sector. India has revealed a comparative advantage in certain segments of the services sector but its services trade policy is still very restrictive, even as compared to China. The extent of liberalisation achieved so far and the outcomes it brought about suggest that the remaining goods and services trade barriers are just one item on the list of reforms that India needs to tackle in order to promote trade-led expansion of labour-intensive activities.

Authors and Affiliations

Amit Chandna

Keywords

Related Articles

Performance Evaluation of Public and Private Sector Banks in India - A Comparative Study

This research paper examines the financial performance evaluation of banking companies in India to examine and to understand how capital adequacy, assets quality, management efficiency, earning quality and liquidity posi...

Analysis of Indian Retail Market Before And After Recession of Indian Economy

Retail became a buzz word in India before recession; in fact the word ‘booming’ was found only attached to this sector. The recent few years gone by were packed with several significant developments for the Indian retail...

The Study of Opportunities and Challenges of Retail Banking in Indian Economy

The increase in retail lending in developing economies can be attributed to the rapid growth of personal wealth, favorable demographic profile, and development in information technology, the conducive macroeconomic envir...

A Study of Factors Influencing the Choices of the Consumers for the Portrayal of Women in Advertising

The role of women has been changing over the years in various fields around the world like advertising, academics, politics, etc. Today 30 per cent of employees in the software industry are women. Advertising has evolved...

A Study on Factors that Affect School Enrolment and Dropout Rates

Education is an affective instrument for social and economic development of society. Education is an affective instrument for social and economic development and national integration. It contributes not only for the deve...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP248421
  • DOI -
  • Views 97
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Amit Chandna (2017). India’s Foreign Trade with China Since Economic Reforms in India. JOURNAL OF COMMERCE AND TRADE, 9(1), 89-98. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-248421