Induction characteristics of sevoflurane in children: A comparison with halothane
Journal Title: Indian Journal of Clinical Anaesthesia - Year 2017, Vol 4, Issue 1
Abstract
Introduction: Halothane has been the inhalational induction agent most often used in paediatric anaesthesia as it provides smooth induction with good intubating conditions. However, it is associated with disadvantages like myocardial depression and arrhythmias. Sevoflurane having low blood-gas solubility allows for rapid induction, has less myocardial depression and its pleasant odour may make it a suitable agent of inhalational induction in children. Hence, the present study was undertaken to compare the induction and intubation characteristics of sevoflurane and halothane. Methods: The study population consisted of 200 children aged 1-12yrs, who were randomly assigned into two groups. Group H received incremental concentrations of halothane 0.5-5% and Group S received incremental concentrations of sevoflurane 1-7%. Induction and intubation times, induction and intubation characteristics, and haemodynamics were studied. Results: The induction and intubation times were shorter with sevoflurane compared with halothane (Group H v/s Group S; induction time 108.6 sec ± 13.3 v/s 64.2 sec ±12.7, intubation time 282.8sec ±34.1 v/s 213sec ±42.6 (P<0.05)). The induction related side effects were minimal with both agents and did not come in the way of smooth induction. 93% children with halothane and 88% children with sevoflurane had acceptable intubating conditions. Halothane was associated with slight decrease in heart rate and mean arterial pressure, whereas sevoflurane was not associated with any significant haemodyamic changes. Conclusion: Sevoflurane produces rapid induction than halothane and intubation time is achieved faster with sevoflurane than halothane. Induction with both agents is associated with minimal induction complications and acceptable intubating conditions are obtained with both agents in majority of children.
Authors and Affiliations
Tejesh CA, Shashikala TK, Viswanathan PN
Prospective randomized controlled study to compare the postoperative analgesic efficacy of intravenous dexmedetomidine and pethidine on patients undergoing lumbosacral spine surgeries
Introduction Spine surgeries especially spine fusion surgeries cause severe postoperative pain hampering convalescence This is a randomized double blind controlled study comparing the analgesic efficacy of postoperative...
Comparing efficacy of epidural dexamethasone versus fentanyl on post operative analgesia – a double blinded randomized study
Introduction: Various techniques and drugs have been adopted to prolong postoperative analgesia. Epidural steroids have been used successfully for long time for chronic pain syndrome. The safety of epidural steroids is w...
A comparative study of intrathecal low dose bupivacaine with fentanyl and low dose levobupivacaine with fentanyl in transurethral resection of prostate: Randomized, double blind, prospective study
Objective: Isobaric levobupivacaine has been recently introduced for intrathecal use and there are very few studies comparing it with widely used hyperbaric bupivacaine. So this randomized trial was planned to study the...
Comparative study of psoas compartment block and sciatic nerve block with that of spinal block anesthesia for lower extremity surgeries
Aim and Objectives: Aim of the present study was to compare the efficacy of the block, hemodynamic effects, postoperative analgesia and side effects of combined psoas compartment sciatic nerve block with continuous spina...
A prospective, randomised, double blind controlled comparative study of antiemetic effects of ramosetron and dexamethasone with ondansetron and dexamethasone combination for prevention of post operative nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing middle ear surgery
Introduction: Post operative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is one of the most frequent complications of middle ear surgery that can result in adverse physical and psychological outcomes. Various antiemetic combinations are...