Influence of Different Intercropping Patterns and Crop Nutrient Sources on Yields of Soybean (Glycine Max)/Maize (Zea Mays) Intercrops in Karara (Lokoja Lga), Kogi State, Nigeria

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted during 2017 and 2018 rainy seasons at the Kogi State Agricultural Development farm at Karara (Lat. 8.230N, Long. 6.560E Alt. 343.00m) in Kogi State, Nigeria to investigates the influence of different cropping patterns and crop nutrient sources on yields of Soybean-Maize intercrops. Treatment consisted of two crops (Maize and Soybean), two fertilizer sources [Organic source (Poultry Manure) and Mineral Fertilizer (Urea)] and Intercropping patterns (2:2, 2:3, 2:4, 2:5), sole maize and soybean as control. All the treatments were given factorial combination and laid in a Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) and replicated three times. The experiment was carried out for two years, the averages obtained indicates the superiority of 2:2 intercropping system over all other systems as exemplified by higher Land Equivalent Ratio (LER) of 1.13, Aggressivity (A) of 0.458, and Competitive Ratio (CR) of 1.63. The 2:2 intercropping system however showed the lowest Relative Crowding Coefficient (RCC) of 0.088 which is an indication for high productivity. Application of mineral fertilizer in the form of Urea was found to be more effective than the use of Poultry manure in both years of the experiment soybean had higher Relative Crowding Coefficient (RCC), Competitive Ratio (CR), and Aggressivity (A) values than maize. Use of mineral fertilizer in the form of urea was more effective than poultry manure in both years. Soybean was more superior in competition than maize, and its productivity dominated the total biomass yields. It was therefore concluded that intercropping soybean with maize at a 2:2 ratio has the potential to improve not only the seed yield but other associated biological yields and high land use efficiently.

Authors and Affiliations

U T Musa,M Yusuf,

Keywords

Related Articles

Do Moroccan Agricultural Cooperatives Have a Social Responsibility? An Exploratory Qualitative Study

In recent years, Moroccan cooperative work has evolved in terms of achieving the objectives of social, economic and environmental development; where the State encourages the creation of agricultural cooperatives in view...

Mathematical Solution of ULTE Based Salt Generation Password Based Key Derivation Function (PBKDF)

In modern life, users use the cloud spaces for storing important data and valuable information. To avoid security problems, every cloud storage provider requires help from several security mechanisms. Every mechanism has...

Relationship of Landscape Positions with Soil Properties on Maize Yield in Ultisol

Relationship of landscape position and soil properties to maize (Zea mays L.) yield was studied in coastal plain soils of Akwa Ibom state. The study aimed at assessing the physico-chemical soil attributes down the geomor...

An integrated safety implementation analysis based on risk assessment to enhance the safety engineering practice in the gas fields of Sylhet region, Bangladesh

The industrial sectors of Bangladesh mostly depend on the petroleum industry. Historically, risk and hazards are the common scenario in the petroleum industry occurring due to lack of efficient risk assessment, resulting...

Informal Lending Practices and Profitability of Rice Retailers in Borongan City

This correlational study explored the relationship between informal lender's practices and profitability of fifty-three (53) rice retailers in city of Borongan using a researcher-made-three part questionnaire on the busi...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP719290
  • DOI https://doi.org/10.54536/ajaset.v7i2.131
  • Views 49
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

U T Musa, M Yusuf, (2023). Influence of Different Intercropping Patterns and Crop Nutrient Sources on Yields of Soybean (Glycine Max)/Maize (Zea Mays) Intercrops in Karara (Lokoja Lga), Kogi State, Nigeria. American Journal of Agricultural Science, Engineering, and Technology, 7(2), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-719290