Instytucjonalny, społeczny i polityczny wymiar pretorianizmu tureckiego

Journal Title: Athenaeum. Polskie Studia Politologiczne - Year 2015, Vol 0, Issue 46

Abstract

The term ‘praetorianism’ refers to countries in which the armed forces influence the political system. The army, as an institution, can develop its political power in two ways: in a “direct” and “indirect” fashion. While in the first case the armed forces take control over state institutions, the second is more sublime and is restricted to the building of more concealed methods of influence, such as blackmail. Additionally, the army itself, as the officers are not engaged into politics, shows a high level of political cohesion and military professionalism. Turkey is an example of a country in which a professional army, after decades of acquiring political experience and under favourable conditions, was and still is able to efficiently exert backstage politics. On one side, TSK (Turkish Armed Forces) has developed constitutional and legal means of influencing the government, and on the other, the high public trust in the armed forces allows it to, if necessary, effectively blackmail or even supplant disobedient cabinets.

Authors and Affiliations

Maciej Herbut

Keywords

Related Articles

Instytucjonalny, społeczny i polityczny wymiar pretorianizmu tureckiego

The term ‘praetorianism’ refers to countries in which the armed forces influence the political system. The army, as an institution, can develop its political power in two ways: in a “direct” and “indirect” fashion. While...

Pakistański program nuklearny w kontekście typologii modeli proliferacji Scotta D. Sagana

The aim of the paper is to present the Pakistani nuclear program in the context of Scott D. Sagan’s models describing the causes of nuclear weapons proliferation. The typology consists of three models: the security, the...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP672783
  • DOI 10.15804/athena.2015.46.02
  • Views 111
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Maciej Herbut (2015). Instytucjonalny, społeczny i polityczny wymiar pretorianizmu tureckiego. Athenaeum. Polskie Studia Politologiczne, 0(46), 20-34. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-672783