INSUPERABLE RULES, ABSENTEEISM AND POLITICAL STRIFE: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE ROMANIAN NATIONAL REFERENDUMS (1990-2018)

Abstract

In the early ‛90s, the newly emerging Romanian democratic state was one of hope and change. After the collapse of the communist regime in Romania, political pluralism was restored, dozens of new political parties were established, and citizens could, finally, vote in free and fair elections. The enthusiasm for the new democracy was evidenced by the first elections from May 1990 in which over 85% of the Romanian voters participated. Subsequent elections registered lower turnouts that reached an alarming rate of 39% in 2008. Since then, participation in presidential elections has increased somewhat, but not enough to show that Romanians are again interested and involved in political life. Paradoxically, participation has been at the lowest during post-communist referendums, although these types of electoral contests bring Romania closer to a participatory democracy, in which citizens assume an increased political role by deciding directly (and not through their representatives) on issues of great political importance. This paper will address the issue of electoral absenteeism in Romania by putting a special emphasis on the political participation in the seven national referendums organized after 1990, in an attempt to show that beyond the legislative constraints imposed by imperfect electoral laws, electoral absenteeism led to electoral disproportionality and parliamentary instability, thus undermining the quality of the Romanian democracy.

Authors and Affiliations

Mihaela Ivanescu

Keywords

Related Articles

IVAN KRASTEV, AFTER EUROPE (PHILADELPHIA: UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA PRESS, 2017), 128 PP

We live in an alert and dynamic world, in which the daily events are more and more unpredictable. We have access to a large amount of information about national and European politics and, consequently, our opinions and g...

A REVIEW OF THE 2015 AND 1999-2011 GENERAL ELECTIONS IN NIGERIA USING PIPPA NORRIS’ ELECTORAL INTEGRITY FRAMEWORK (EIF)

In a democratic setting, elections remain a universally acceptable means of choosing leaders. They are regarded as the heart of a democracy because they confer political legitimacy to governments in a democratic setting....

POLITICS AND POLITICIANS IN NIGERIA: ESTABLISHING THE NEXUS BETWEEN THE ACTORS, THEIR ACTIONS, AND NATION BUILDING

Scholars have argued that there exists a sort of relationship between politics, politicians and nation building. This is based on the fact that the concept of politics refers to a process by which people (“professional p...

POPULISMO – NEOLIBERALISMO – DEMOCRACIA: UNA RELACIÓN COMPLEJA

In this article, we sought to analyze the relationships established by the phenomenon of populism/neo-populism in relation with the neoliberal economic model, and with democracy, respectively. Given how dominant and pate...

NON-MUSCULAR MEDIATION: A HOPELESS UNDERTAKING OR THE WAY TO PEACE?

The domain of conflict resolution is broad since peace and international security are at the centre of the United Nations (UN). From the beginning, UN member states have pledged to pursue peaceful resolutions through dif...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP538977
  • DOI -
  • Views 96
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Mihaela Ivanescu (2018). INSUPERABLE RULES, ABSENTEEISM AND POLITICAL STRIFE: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE ROMANIAN NATIONAL REFERENDUMS (1990-2018). Analele Universității „Ovidius” din Constanța - seria Științe Politice, 7(1), 133-154. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-538977