INSUPERABLE RULES, ABSENTEEISM AND POLITICAL STRIFE: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE ROMANIAN NATIONAL REFERENDUMS (1990-2018)

Abstract

In the early ‛90s, the newly emerging Romanian democratic state was one of hope and change. After the collapse of the communist regime in Romania, political pluralism was restored, dozens of new political parties were established, and citizens could, finally, vote in free and fair elections. The enthusiasm for the new democracy was evidenced by the first elections from May 1990 in which over 85% of the Romanian voters participated. Subsequent elections registered lower turnouts that reached an alarming rate of 39% in 2008. Since then, participation in presidential elections has increased somewhat, but not enough to show that Romanians are again interested and involved in political life. Paradoxically, participation has been at the lowest during post-communist referendums, although these types of electoral contests bring Romania closer to a participatory democracy, in which citizens assume an increased political role by deciding directly (and not through their representatives) on issues of great political importance. This paper will address the issue of electoral absenteeism in Romania by putting a special emphasis on the political participation in the seven national referendums organized after 1990, in an attempt to show that beyond the legislative constraints imposed by imperfect electoral laws, electoral absenteeism led to electoral disproportionality and parliamentary instability, thus undermining the quality of the Romanian democracy.

Authors and Affiliations

Mihaela Ivanescu

Keywords

Related Articles

SHOWCASING MUSSOLINI ABROAD: A CASE STUDY OF THE ITALIAN BOOKSHOP’S PROPAGANDA IN BUCHAREST (1931-1938)

Since Mussolini’s Italy wished to counteract French political and cultural influences in the Danube-Balkan region, the dictatorship not only turned to the tools of traditional diplomacy, but also made steady use of cultu...

POLITICS AND POLITICIANS IN NIGERIA: ESTABLISHING THE NEXUS BETWEEN THE ACTORS, THEIR ACTIONS, AND NATION BUILDING

Scholars have argued that there exists a sort of relationship between politics, politicians and nation building. This is based on the fact that the concept of politics refers to a process by which people (“professional p...

NON-MUSCULAR MEDIATION: A HOPELESS UNDERTAKING OR THE WAY TO PEACE?

The domain of conflict resolution is broad since peace and international security are at the centre of the United Nations (UN). From the beginning, UN member states have pledged to pursue peaceful resolutions through dif...

REGIONALIZATION IN ROMANIA: NECESSITY OR EU REQUEST?

Early on, after the experience of communism, Romania embraced the European path. However, the traditional centralized state structures inherited from the communist period made the transition difficult. In 1998, eight dev...

GEOGRAPHY AS A POLITICAL TOOL: SHAPING ELECTORAL CONSTITUENCIES IN THE MODERN AGE

In the XIXth century and at the beginning of the XXth century, as a consequence of the gradual extension of the voting rights influenced by the European liberal Left, representatives of the Conservative Right – the old a...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP538977
  • DOI -
  • Views 95
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Mihaela Ivanescu (2018). INSUPERABLE RULES, ABSENTEEISM AND POLITICAL STRIFE: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE ROMANIAN NATIONAL REFERENDUMS (1990-2018). Analele Universității „Ovidius” din Constanța - seria Științe Politice, 7(1), 133-154. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-538977