Intrathecal Hyperbaric Bupivacaine and Isobaric Levobupivacaine for Spinal Anaesthesia: Block Characteristics and Clinical Effects
Journal Title: Indian Journal of Anesthesia and Analgesia - Year 2019, Vol 6, Issue 2
Abstract
Introduction: Bupivacaine (0.5% heavy) is used to administer subarachnoid block but carries an increased risk of cardiac and central nervous system toxicity if inadvertently injected intravascularly. Levobupivacaine is S-enantiomer of racemic bupivacaine with lesser systemic toxicity. A study was done to compare isobaric levobupivacaine and hyperbaric bupivacaine for spinal anaesthesia in patients undergoing elective lower abdominal surgeries to study hemodynamic variations, sensory and motor blocking properties of these. Methods: A prospective randomized controlled double blind study was conducted in 100 patients of ASA I and II physical status posted for elective lower abdominal surgeries under subarachnoid block, randomized into 2 groups with 50 patients each, received either 3 ml of 0.5% isobaric levobupivacaine (group L) or 3 ml of 0.5% hyperbaric Bupivacaine (group B). Hemodynamic parameters, time for onset of sensory and motor blockade, maximum height of sensory block and total duration of sensory and motor blockade were recorded. Intraoperative or postoperative side effects were noted. Results: The incidence of hypotension and bradycardia were comparable between the two groups. Onset of sensory and motor block (L-2.88 ± 1.81, B-2.12 ± 0.47, p value 0.005, L-3.12 ± 1.62, B-2.28 ± 0.81, p value 0.001, respectively) were significantly delayed in levobupivacaine group. The total duration of sensory block (L- 190.04 ± 35.19, B- 204.02 ± 30.06, p value 0.035) and motor block (L-176.65 ± 40.64, B 204.46 ± 29.8, p value<0.001) were higher in bupivacaine group. Conclusion: 0.5% isobaric levobupivacaine could be an alternative to 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine for spinal anaesthesia with similar hemodynamic changes, side effects and shorter durations of sensory and motor blockade.
Authors and Affiliations
Chandana MH
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP619291
- DOI 10.21088/ijaa.2349.8471.6219.29
- Views 110
- Downloads 0
Preventable Anesthesia Mishaps: An Overview
We report a case of malposition of the vaporizer on the selectatec manifold of the anesthesia workstation leading to interruption in the fresh gas flow at anesthesia machine outlet. We emphasize the importance of checkin...
A Comparative Study to Evaluate the Intubating Conditions between Propofol-Sevoflurane and Propofol Alone Without Using Neuromuscular Blocking Agents
Endotracheal intubation using an induction agent is usually facilitated by the use of depolarizing neuromuscular blocking agents like succinylcholine however it may be associated with various side effects. Propofol and s...
Effects of Intravenous Dexmedetomidine on Bupivacaine Spinal Anaesthesia: A Placebo Controlled Randomised Trial
Endotracheal intubation using an induction agent is usually facilitated by the use of depolarizingBackground: Endotracheal intubation using an induction agent is usually facilitated by the use of depolarizing neuromuscul...
Comparison of Dexmedetomidine with Esmolol as Hypotensive Agents in Elective ENT Surgeries in General Anaesthesia: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Objective: To compare the efficacy of dexmedetomidine as a hypotensive agent with esmolol in elective ENT Surgeries in ASA grade III patients. Methods: This study was a prospective, randomized, double blinded study that...
Comparison of Equipotent Doses of Hyperbaric Ropivacaine and Hyperbaric Levobupivacaine in Spinal Anaesthesia for Patients Undergoing Lower Abdominal and Lower Limb Surgeries
Background: Spinal anaesthesia provides sensory as well as motor blockade. Levobupivacaine is less cardio toxic than bupivacaine, as it has decreased potency at the sodium channel. Ropivacaine is similar in chemical stru...