Intrathecal Hyperbaric Bupivacaine with Two Different Doses of Clonidine in Lower Limb Orthopaedic Surgery: A Comparative Study

Journal Title: Journal of Medical Science And clinical Research - Year 2017, Vol 5, Issue 5

Abstract

Introduction: Spinal anaesthesia has long been known to be of benefit to patients undergoing major orthopaedic procedure. Numerous studies have investigated the effects of intrathecal clonidine coadministered with local anesthetics; very few studies have focused on small doses and a real dose-response in orthopedic patients. We assessed effectiveness and safety profile of two different combinations. Material and Method: 75 patients undergoing lower limb orthopaedic surgery were randomised into 3 groups of 25 each to receive 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine (B); clonidine 75 μg (0.5 ml) with 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine (BC-75); or clonidine 150 μg (1 ml) with 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine (BC-150). The onset and duration of sensory and motor blockade; and duration of post-operative analgesia were the primary outcome. Safety and hemodynamic changes were assessed as secondary outcomes. Results: The onset and time to reach surgical anaesthesia at level L1 were significantly early with combinations (BC-150 < BC-75 < B). Total duration of analgesia and time to 2-segment regression were significantly longer (BC-150 > BC-75 > B). The response was dose dependant. No patients required supplemental analgesia intra-operatively. Onset of motor block was less in BC-75. Duration was significantly higher with combinations (BC-150 > BC-75 > B). The response was again dose dependant. Post-operative analgesia was also significantly longer (BC-150 > BC-75 > B). Minor haemodynamic changes were seen in all three groups. Few complications were reported with BC-150. Conclusion: Small doses of clonidine (≤150 g) when added to bupivacaine, significantly improves the sensory anaesthesia and post-operative analgesia in dose dependent manner; with relative haemodynamic stability and few adverse effects. The combinations are recommended when patients are scheduled for long orthopaedic procedures.

Authors and Affiliations

Dr Prasad Ingley

Keywords

Related Articles

Study of Gram Negative Bacterial Isolates From Lower Respiratory Tract Infections (LRTI) and Their Antibiogram Pattern in A Tertiary Care Hospital in South India

Introduction: Lower respiratory tract infections (LRTI) are common human diseases, the morbidity and mortality of which varies depending on the underlying etiological agent and its virulence. With emerging drug resistanc...

Study of Psychosocial Factors in Young and Elderly Asthmatics

Introduction: Asthma affects the children, young, as well as elderly populations. Psychosocial factors have been extensively studied in children and younger asthmatics. They can have a significant impact in the elderly a...

Effectiveness of Ropivacaine versus Levobupivacaine for Spinal Anaesthesia and Analgesia in Lower Limb Surgery

Introduction: Newer local anaesthetic amides Ropivacaine and Levobupivacaine have gained popularity for spinal anaesthesia due to lower cardiotxicity and neurotoxicity. In this prospective, randomized double blind study...

Effectiveness of Aroma Therapy on Level of Anxiety among Adolescent Girls

Anxiety occurs naturally in most people’s lives at one point or another often experienced by individuals prior to a significant experience in their lives brought on by a specific situation. Anxiety is “an episodic experi...

Histiod Leprosy-How Is It Different From Lepromatous Leprosy?-A Case Report

Histoid leprosy, a rare variant of lepromatous leprosy has characteristic clinico- pathological manifestations .We present this case due to their rarity, atypicality of dermal lesions, failure in early diagnosis, and hig...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP285434
  • DOI -
  • Views 29
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Dr Prasad Ingley (2017). Intrathecal Hyperbaric Bupivacaine with Two Different Doses of Clonidine in Lower Limb Orthopaedic Surgery: A Comparative Study. Journal of Medical Science And clinical Research, 5(5), 22147-22156. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-285434