Introduction: Methodical Aspects of Comparison
Journal Title: Religions - Year 2018, Vol 9, Issue 3
Abstract
Much ink has been spilled over the significance, the risks and benefits, and even the very possibility of comparison in the study of religion, but few scholars have reflected on how comparison actually works. Which methodical components should a comparative study include? Which problems does the comparativist encounter in deploying the comparative method? How is the design of the method related to the outcome of the study and to its value for the study of religion? The essays in this special issue begin to tackle these questions through analyses of concrete comparative studies. The special issue has an unusual format which requires an explanation. The essays emerged from a panel on methodical aspects of comparison at the Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Religion in Atlanta in 2015. The panelists—who are also the authors of the present essays—were experienced comparativists in their respective fields: Francis X. Clooney (Harvard University), David M. Freidenreich (Colby College), Barbara A. Holdrege (University of California, Santa Barbara), and Jens Kreinath (Wichita State University). Kathryn McClymond (Georgia State University) served as a respondent at the panel session but contributed her own full essay here. These comparativists were invited to analyze and reflect upon their own comparative work along the lines of a basic methodological framework that I had outlined. Originally this was meant to be more of a specialists’ roundtable, an opportunity for experienced comparativists to exchange ideas about the ways they employ the comparative method. Surprisingly, to me at least, the panel session was very well attended (with an audience of ca. 50 members), and afterwards some audience members requested that the contributions be published. Apparently this discussion struck a chord.
Authors and Affiliations
Oliver Freiberger
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP25945
- DOI https://doi.org/10.3390/rel9030077
- Views 337
- Downloads 9
How do Psychiatric Staffs Approach Religiosity/Spirituality in Clinical Practice? Differing Perceptions among Psychiatric Staff Members and Clinical Chaplains
The present study examined the perception of contemporary German psychiatric staff (i.e., psychiatrists, psychotherapists and nurses) regarding their approach towards religious/spiritual issues in their clinical practi...
Violent Jihad and Beheadings in the Land of Al Fatoni Darussalam
The early 2000s has seen a revival of the Patani resistance manifesting in a violent jihad and new forms of extreme violence never witnessed before in the century-long Southern Thailand conflict. Transported by neojiha...
Acknowledgement to Reviewers of Religions in 2016
The editors of Religions would like to express their sincere gratitude to the following reviewers for assessing manuscripts in 2016. We greatly appreciate the contribution of expert reviewers, which is crucial to the j...
Art, Trent, and Michelangelo’s “Last Judgment”
Michelangelo’s ―Last Judgment‖ in the Sistine Chapel is one of the world’s most famous paintings, completed in 1542. Greatly admired, it was also criticized for the frontal nudity of some of the figures. Twenty-two yea...
Cultivating an Academy We Can Live With: The Humanities and Education for Sustainability
Many facets of the university system in North America are fundamentally unsustainable, developing and perpetuating knowledge practices that not only do not sustain the biospheric conditions in which our species evolved...