INVESTIGATOR’S POWERS IN CASE OF A SUSPECT’S FAILURE TO ARRIVE UPON SUMMON

Abstract

The article is devoted to analysis of investigator’s powers in case of a suspect’s failure to arrive upon summon. It is stated that in such a case criminal procedural sanctions include compulsory appearance, imposition of pecuniary penalty, conducting special pre-trial investigation, change of a measure of restraint, search, reversion of a bail into the State’s revenue, whereas grounds of imposing them are not always related to each other, especially with regard to a suspect. It is argued that consequences of a suspect’s failure must be proportionate to the character of the failure, that is, whether it happened once or systematically. Thus, the article of the CPC of Ukraine concerning the possibility of announcing the search of a suspect in a case of his failure to arrive subject to the interpretation stated in Article 139 § 5 (‘failure to appear on summon’) should be altered. Consequently, it is proposed that Article 281 § 1 should read as follows: ‘1. If, in the course of the pre-trial investigation, the whereabouts of the suspect are unknown or the person in question is outside Ukraine and fails to appear without a valid reason more than twice subject to its proper notification, than investigator, prosecutor announces his search.’ It is stated that provision 201 of Section XI Transitional provisions of the CPC of Ukraine requires changes in regard to characteristics of failure to appear for investigation and a court within the context of failures to appear to summon. It is proposed that Article 188 § 1 of the CPC of Ukraine reads as follows: ‘Prosecutor, investigator upon approval of prosecutor has the right to file a motion on permission for apprehension for compelled appearance for his participation in consideration of a motion on enforcement of a measure of restraint in the form of custody, house arrest, bail, or change of a measure of restraint in the form of custody, house arrest, bail.

Authors and Affiliations

І. П. Зіньковський

Keywords

Related Articles

LEGAL REGULATION OF TAXATION OF ACTIVITIES RELATED TO THE USE OF TECHNOGENIC DEPOSITS

In the article the author raises questions of definition and resolution of problems of legal regulation of administrative-legal regime of the use of man-made deposits in Ukraine. The author described a system of normativ...

LEGAL BEHAVIOR: A THEORETICAL ANALYSIS OF THE MAIN COMPONENTS

The article deals with the problem of the main components of legal behavior. The Soviet doctrine of law and modern Ukrainian position concerning the understanding of the phenomenon of «composition of legal behavior» has...

SCIENTIFIC MEASUREMENT OF MORAL BACKGROUND ACTIVITY OF THE INSTITUTE OF ADVOCATES IN THE CONTEXT OF PROBLEMS OF THE STATE AND THE RIGHT OF THEORY

The article deals with the problems of the moral principles of the Institute of Advocacy in the context of the problems of the theory of state and law. The key concepts of research, the relationship and the delineation o...

CONCEPTION OF LAW (UNDERSTANDING OF LAW): GNOSIOLOGICAL LAPSUS LINGUAE

The article is devoted to elucidation of possibility of cognition of law. The author enlightens the existing approaches to cognition of the notion «understanding of law». Usually, understanding of law is regarded as a sc...

TEMPORAL REMOVAL OF JUDGE FROM REALIZATION OF JUSTICE IN CONNECTION WITH BRINGING IN TO CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY

An author examines some problem questions of removal from realization of justice in connection with bringing in to criminal responsibility. Grounded, that the dismissal of judge on a current criminal judicial legislation...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP642969
  • DOI -
  • Views 108
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

І. П. Зіньковський (2018). INVESTIGATOR’S POWERS IN CASE OF A SUSPECT’S FAILURE TO ARRIVE UPON SUMMON. Юридичний науковий електронний журнал, 2(), 212-214. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-642969