Is Modernity a Third Axial Age?
Journal Title: NETSOL: New Trends in Social and Liberal Sciences - Year 2019, Vol 4, Issue 2
Abstract
In the book where he coined the term “Axial Age”, Karl Jaspers noted that human history included both “tranquil ages” and “ages of change”. This paper begins with the observation that this oscillation between stable and transformational periods encapsulates the pattern in complexity theory by which systems oscillate between relatively long “stable states” and shorter “phase transitions”. Applying this pattern, the coauthors speculate that human history has undergone three such “axial” phase transitions – the Neolithic Revolution, the Axial Age, and Modernity. During each of these periods, the older dominant social structures proved inadequate, as populations grew, new technologies appeared, and new social conflicts became more intense. To meet these challenges, people in the societies where these transformations occurred became more innovative, exploring new ways to use recently developed technologies and introducing a variety of social experiments. By the end of these ages of change, new social structures would become dominant across Eurasia. Today, Modernity, as the third axial age, seems to be coming to an end, making this pattern a valuable tool for understanding our world.
Authors and Affiliations
Ken Baskin, Dmitri M. Bondarenko
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP671217
- DOI 10.24819/netsol2019.05
- Views 113
- Downloads 0
Humanitarian Activity in the Context of the Balkan Wars
This article examines humanitarian activity and its multi-dimensional aspects with a case study of the Balkan Wars (1912-13). The article presents that while it is difficult to find neutral humanitarian aid, the humanita...
Muslim Youth Experiences in Quebec Secondary Schools: Race, Racialization, and the 'Dangerous Muslim Man'
This article examined the lived experiences of Muslim men who had attended secondary schools in Quebec in the post-9/11 context. Employing a critical ethnographic approach stemming from institutional ethnography, this st...
Book Review: Natalia Molina, How Race is Made in America: Immigration, Citizenship, and the Historical Power of Racial Scripts, Los Angeles and Berkeley: University of California Press, 2014
Natalia Molina is a Professor of History and Associate Vice Chancellor of Faculty Diversity and Equity at the University of California, San Diego. Molina’s How Race is Made in America: Immigration, Citizenship, and the H...
Elephant in the Room: The Dysfunctional State of Affairs in Indo-European Language Studies . Book Review: Asya Pereltsvaig and Martin W. Lewis. The Indo-European Controversy: Facts and Fallacies in Historical Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016.
The Indo-European Controversy: Facts and Fallacies in Historical Linguistics, is an effort by Asya Pereltsvaig and Martin Lewis to shed light on a recent study that, despite glaring methodological inadequacies, managed t...
Peace Process Pathologies: A Comparative Analysis of the Breakdown of the Israeli-Palestinian and Turkish-Kurdish Peace Processes
Despite the significant differences between the issues under contention, the Oslo peace process between Israel and the Palestinians and the “solution process” between Turkey and the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK) were pl...