Is Peer Assessment Reliable in Objectively Structured Clinical Examination?

Journal Title: Bagcilar Medical Bulletin - Year 2021, Vol 6, Issue 1

Abstract

Objective: The study was designed to evaluate the reliability of the peer assessment in the objectively structured clinical examination (OSCE) for the summative assessment of 4th grade students at the end of general surgery clerkship. Method: The study was planned prospectively with the permission of the Dean of Medicine Faculty and approval of the ethics committee. The 6th grade students who were in the surgery rotation participated in the study as peer assessors (PA). Both peers and department of general surgery assessed the students. Pass/fail point was accepted as 60. The scores of OSCE and performance evaluation given by peers and faculty were compared statistically. Results: Twenty-three students completed general surgery clerkship. Ten students (43.5%) were female. According to performance scores given by the faculty, 15 (65.2%) of the 23 students were successful, while all students were considered successful (having a grade of 60 or more) based on the scores of peer evaluation. There was a significant difference between the faculty members and PA with regard to the performance evaluation (p=0.008). The faculty members found five students (27.8%) successful in the OSCE (having a grade of 60 or more). However, ten students (43.5%) received a score of at least six from peer evaluation. Although there was a difference, it was not significant (p=0.063). Gender did not affect scoring in performance evaluation and OSCE application. Conclusion: Although there was a difference between faculty members and peer evaluators in the performance evaluation, no difference was observed in OSCE. In conclusion, OSCE assessment by peer evaluators is reliable.

Authors and Affiliations

Hasan Dagmura, Emin Daldal, Hüseyin Bakır, Mehmet Fatih Daşıran, Zeki Özsoy, Osman Demir, İsmail Okan, Ertan Bülbüloğlu

Keywords

Related Articles

Assessment of the Quality and Reliability of the Information on Bone Tumor on Youtube

Objective: Our aim is to assess the content quality and reliability of Youtube videos on bone tumors. Method: We searched Youtube using the keyword “bone tumors,” and included the first 50 videos listed in our study. Tw...

A Rarity, Oncocytoma of the Eyelid

Eyelid tumors are most common in the skin, and lacrimal gland and adnex origin are very rare. Although oxyphilic adenoma (oncocytoma) is generally located in the internal organ, it is one of the rare areas where it can h...

Anesthesia Experience in a Patient with Myotonia Congenita

Myotonia congenita (MC) was first described as a skeletal muscle disorder by Thomsen in 1876. As a result of the mutation of the chloride channel gene (CLCN1), which is on the 17th chromosome, patients suffer from muscle...

Extreme Calvarial and Upper Cervical Hyperpneumatization: A Case Report

The pneumatization of bones of cranial base other than the mastoid process and temporal bone is a pathologic and rare condition, and it may cause some serious complications. Extension of the pneumatization to the cranial...

Microsurgical Clipping of Anterior Circle of Willis Aneurysms: A Retrospective Study

Objective: The surgical outcomes of anterior circle of Willis aneurysms were evaluated. Material and Methods: Between March 2015 and December 2016, 38 patients were operated and followed up for aneurysms. There were 15...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP693316
  • DOI 10.4274/BMB.galenos.2020.09.054
  • Views 105
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Hasan Dagmura, Emin Daldal, Hüseyin Bakır, Mehmet Fatih Daşıran, Zeki Özsoy, Osman Demir, İsmail Okan, Ertan Bülbüloğlu (2021). Is Peer Assessment Reliable in Objectively Structured Clinical Examination?. Bagcilar Medical Bulletin, 6(1), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-693316