Is State Preemption Weakening the Authoritarian Resilience of Local Government in the United States?

Journal Title: Studia Iuridica - Year 2019, Vol 79, Issue

Abstract

In many countries in the world today democratic institutions and ideals seem threatened. Due process, equal protection, freedom of speech, freedom of the press, the right to vote, and other democratic ideals are deeply ingrained in US culture and government. Traditionally, the federal government is thought to be the guardian of these rights, ensuring that state governments adhere to the rule of law established by our written constitution. Similarly, state governments are thought to uphold these democratic ideals vis a vis local governments. The American system of checks and balances and separation of powers and the resulting interplay between the branches of government are considered safeguards that protect the rule of law. This horizontal separation of powers often overshadows the similar function served by the vertical separation of governmental power created by our division of power into federal, state and local. If the federal and state governments act contrary to the rule of law established by our federal and state constitutions, local governments offer at least some degree of authoritarian resilience. The goal of this article is to set forth the manner in which local governments may resist anti-democratic action from federal and state governments and then to discuss the danger posed in the United States by the recent increase in State preemptions of local government power – particularly in regard to sanctuary cities, climate change, gun regulation, affordable housing, and LGBT rights. Ultimately, governments at different levels are intended to monitor each other and when local governments are preempted from exercising their powers in regard to socially important issues their authoritarian resilience is seriously impaired.<br/><br/>

Authors and Affiliations

Julian C. Juergensmeyer, Andrew F. Prater

Keywords

Related Articles

From Criminalistics to CSI: Warsaw. Practical methods of teaching criminalistics at the Department of Criminalistics, University of Warsaw

Forensics and criminalistics at the end of 20th century won a lot of public attention thanks to popular TV series, such as CSI: Crime Scene Investigation. It has fueled new programs in forensics worldwide. Paper presents...

Prawo do sądu w orzecznictwie Trybunału Konstytucyjnego oraz Europejskiego Trybunału Praw Człowieka

The article focuses on the main issues identified by the European Court of Human Rights and the Constitutional Tribunal in regard of implementation of the law and access to the court in civil proceedings. Further discuss...

Układ części ogólnej postępowania nieprocesowego

The article presents the problems of the arrangement of the part of general non-contentious proceedings (art. 506–525 of the Code of Civil Procedure of 1964 ‒ abbreviation: „c.c.p.”). The scope of this issue includes thr...

Lasy miejskie na obszarach skomunalizowanych. Problematyka prawno-organizacyjna

As a result of communalization of state property, local self-governments received significant areas of forests related territorially to the areas of cities and communes. The lack of, apart from a few exceptions, speciali...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP559837
  • DOI 10.5604/01.3001.0013.1892
  • Views 107
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Julian C. Juergensmeyer, Andrew F. Prater (2019). Is State Preemption Weakening the Authoritarian Resilience of Local Government in the United States?. Studia Iuridica, 79(), 148-165. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-559837