Is that courtesy stigma? The issue of the stigmatization of psychiatry, psychiatrists and psychotherapists

Journal Title: Current Problems of Psychiatry - Year 2015, Vol 16, Issue 3

Abstract

The stigma of mental illness covers negative attitudes and convictions toward mentally ill people. Stigmatization results in perceiving stigmatized individuals as worse than other members of the society. This phenomenon is a social problem affecting almost all mentally ill patients and manifests in severe impairment of their social functioning. In the development of stigmatization there can be distinguished successive, logically connected stages, such as labeling, stereotyping, separating, discrimination. According to Goffman’s theory people who work with the stigmatized social groups receive the so called “courtesy stigma”, which can be described as the public disapproval resulting from associating with stigmatized individual or group. Courtesy stigma affects family members of stigmatized individuals, therapists, people working in the health and social welfare services. The World Psychiatric Association appreciating the importance of the problem of stigmatization has initiated diverse activities with the aim to improve the image of psychiatry and to reduce stigmatizing attitudes toward psychiatry and psychiatrists. The mass media have great influence in shaping people’s attitudes towards psychiatry as a medical discipline, psychiatrists and mentally ill individuals. Cooperation with the representatives of mass media and providing them with reliable data concerning mental public health are important challenges for contemporary psychiatry. It seems very important to dissuade people who take part in creating reality through mass media from creating and using unjust stereotypes. Counteracting the stigmatization of psychiatry is very important for improving the situation of mentally ill people, their relatives and the society in general. In the article there can be found a review of studies on stigmatization of psychiatrists, therapists and of psychiatry as a medical discipline.

Authors and Affiliations

Ewelina Dziwota, Anna Porębska, Michał Próchnicki, Barbara Drapała, Magdalena Gaj, Marcin Olajossy

Keywords

Related Articles

Stanisław Dutkiewicz – a gift realised by disease

Stanisław Dutkiewicz lived from 1923 to 2003. He was a lawyer, a famous painter and a graphic artist. He lived in Grodzisk Mazowiecki. In the early years of his life he was diagnosed as having the bipolar affective disor...

Who are those guys? The profile of domestic violence perpetrators: financial situation, employment and health status

Violence against women is a universal problem, appearing all around the world, with different frequency. The aim of this work was to investigate the prevalence of domestic violence in the study group and to present the...

Characteristics and assessment of stress management workshop for psoriasis patients

Psoriasis is one of the so-called psychodermatological diseases. It can give rise to a range of psychological problems in affected individuals, like high stress level, low self-esteem, altered body image, and affective d...

A Psycho-Lexical Taxonomy of Belarusian language

Identification of terms describing personality traits in Belarusian language was the aim of current psycho-lexical study. This was accomplished by analysing 105 thousand words from an unabridged dictionary of Belarusian...

Online activity and family relationships as exemplified by high school students

It is difficult for modern man to imagine life without the Internet. Apart from indisputable profits associated with using this me- dium, the researchers more and more often stress the negative results of irresponsible u...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP106648
  • DOI -
  • Views 125
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Ewelina Dziwota, Anna Porębska, Michał Próchnicki, Barbara Drapała, Magdalena Gaj, Marcin Olajossy (2015). Is that courtesy stigma? The issue of the stigmatization of psychiatry, psychiatrists and psychotherapists. Current Problems of Psychiatry, 16(3), 158-164. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-106648