Islamic Modernists and Discourse on Reason as a Reconciliatory Argument between Islam and the Western Enlightenment
Journal Title: International Journal of Islamic Thought - Year 2015, Vol 7, Issue 1
Abstract
This article examines the debates on the relationship between Islam and reason during the nineteenth century and early twentieth century. It argues that these debates were transnational but were largely influenced by similar debates in the Western tradition. It also affirms that modernists used discourse on reason to reconcile Islam with Western Enlightenment. The article illustrates the various mechanisms which Islamic modernists implemented to facilitate such reconciliation. These mechanisms include rationalization of miracles, contesting the concept of prophethood, and rejecting the scholarship of Islamic jurisprudence and theology. Based on writings by several Islamic modernists, such as their biographies of Prophet Muhammad, Quran commentaries, and magazine articles in different Islamic countries, I ascribe these mechanisms to a gap between logic and experimental thought, a gap which seeped into the mind of Islamic modernists under the influence of Western contemporary thinkers. While this discourse claims compatibility between Islam and Western Enlightenment, it also resists the binary of the sacred and the secular, a major legacy of the Western Enlightenment.
Authors and Affiliations
ASMAHAN SALLAH
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP122299
- DOI -
- Views 140
- Downloads 0
Leadership Characteristic of the Gifted and Talented Student: Implication on Islamic Youth Leadership
Leadership is an important characteristic that enables Gifted and Talented Students (GTS) to assume responsibility in the near future. This study aims to examine the levels of leadership characteristic and identify the l...
Pemikiran Politik dan Kenegaraan Mohammad Natsir
Soon after gaining independence, discourse on making Syariah as a constitutional basis of state in Indonesia was widely regarded as a trending topic to discuss among politicians, Mohammad Natsir was one of them. This art...
Thinking Muhammad Legenhausen's Non-Reductive Pluralism Through: Some Reflections about its Implications
One of the most vibrant contemporary philosophical debates concerns the definition, and defence, of religious pluralism. The philosophers who address such a topic usually hold widely divergent views regarding its exact d...
Falsafah Alam dalam Konteks Falsafah Ketuhanan Menurut Hamka
Islam via al-Quran strongly stresses the significant existence of nature. The creation of universal nature is considered as ultimate proof of the existence of God, the Creator. Islamic philosophers or religious thinkers...
Elias al-Maqdisi & Sam Solomon. 2010. Al-Yahud: Eternal Islamic Enmity & the Jews. Charlottesville, Virginia: ANM Publishers, pp. 1-193. ISBN 9-780971-534636.
Book Review