JUDGE'S DISCIPLINARY AMENABILITY FOR DISCLAIMING ABOUT INTERFERENCE IN EXECUTION OF JUSTICE

Abstract

This article is of interest to judges of Ukraine and organs, which execute disciplinary proceedings concerning them. Mainly, author’s attention is concentrated on such offense: judge of the High Council of Justice and the General Prosecutor gave any notice in writing about interference in execution of justice, including appeal to judge by litigants or other individuals, including individuals, who were authorized to execute state functions on specific cases, if an appeal was made in other way than it was provided by the procedural law, during five days after he had been informed about such case. At the present, judges have any distinctness about interference in the execution of justice. Experts, who investigate normative principles to secure independence for judges of Ukraine, prove that despite the improvement of constitutional and legislative regulation, corruption, including telephone law and political dependence, is latent occurrence in the courts as result of long-term freemasonry. Judges who committed corruption acts are vulnerable to influence of official bodies, because they waive their independence for impunity. That's why judges don't advise about enforcement in each case, in other cases – they don't consider obvious cases of interference like “friendly request”. Given the foregoing, the question of defining the components of disciplinary offense is currently relevant according to paragraph 6 part 1 article 106 of the Law of Ukraine “About Judicial System and Status of Judges” № 1402-VIII, namely determination of legal content of illegal judge's inaction for disclaiming about interference in execution of justice (or any other influence for making decision on specific case).

Authors and Affiliations

Oksana Mashevska

Keywords

Related Articles

UNDERSTANDING FREEDOM IN EUROPEAN PHILOSOPHY OF RIGHT (XIV-XVII centuries)

The article is devoted to the analysis of views on the concept of freedom in the European philosophy of law (XIV-XVII centuries). The modern philosophical and legal concept of freedom as a category of natural law is base...

DEFINITION OF THE ANTHROPOLOGICAL TYPE AND ETHNIC COMMUNITY OF THE PERSON IN THE CRIMINALISTIC DESCRIPTION OF HIS APPEARANCE

The article deals with the concepts of the anthropological type (race) and various ethnic communities (people, nationality, ethnic group) with reference to the criminalistic verbal description of the external appearance...

SUBJECTSOF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION: MODERN DETERMINATION

Administration activity of the subjects of public administration is considered in the article. The general characteristic is given and the legal status of the subjects of public administration is revealed. The role of th...

PARTIES TO THE SURROGATE MOTHERHOOD AGREEMENT ACCORDING TO UKRAINIAN LEGISLATION

The article deals with the civil-legal regulation of the agreement for surrogacy. Special attention was focused on the parties to this agreement. Article studies genetic parents and surrogate mother as parties to the Sur...

THEORETICAL AND LEGAL ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL FUNCTION IN THE SYSTEM OF THE STATE FISCAL POLICY

The analysis of interrelated legal categories «state policy», «fiscal policy», «finances» is carried out. Found that finance as an economic and legal category, play a priority role in the implementation of fiscal policy...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP570570
  • DOI 10.25313/2520-2308-2018-9-4422
  • Views 107
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Oksana Mashevska (2018). JUDGE'S DISCIPLINARY AMENABILITY FOR DISCLAIMING ABOUT INTERFERENCE IN EXECUTION OF JUSTICE. Міжнародний науковий журнал "Інтернаука". Серія: "Юридичні науки", 1(9), 14-28. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-570570