Knowledge and Attitude of Mothers Towards Childhood Vaccination in Taif, Saudi Arabia
Journal Title: The Journal of Medicine, Law & Public Health (JMLPH) - Year 2022, Vol 2, Issue 2
Abstract
Background: Misconceptions and inadequate knowledge about vaccination represent an important barrier against adherence to vaccination schedules. Objectives: To assess the knowledge and attitude of mothers of children under five years of age with regard to standard childhood vaccination. Subjects and methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted at Taif Children’s Hospital (a subsidiary of the Ministry of Health), Saudi Arabia, among a sample of mothers of children aged below five years attending the hospital’s outpatient clinics during the study period of May-July 2021. A valid questionnaire was utilised for data collection, comprising demographic questions as well as an assessment of respondents’ knowledge and attitude towards childhood vaccination. Results: The study included 397 mothers, more than half of whom (53.9%) were aged between 20 and 30 years. Overall, the total knowledge score ranged between 5 and 10, with an arithmetic mean of 9.03 and standard deviation of (± 1.25). Higher-educated mothers (university or above) were more knowledgeable about childhood vaccination than lesser-educated mothers (mean ranks were 200.44 and 123.35, respectively), p=0.020. Overall, the total score for attitude towards childhood vaccination ranged between 5 and 10, with an arithmetic mean of 9.15 and standard deviation of (± 0.48). Married mothers expressed a more positive attitude towards childhood vaccination than divorced mothers (mean ranks were 200.83 and 144.81, respectively), p=0.014. Conclusion: The knowledge about, and attitude towards, childhood vaccination among mothers in Taif, Saudi Arabia are excellent. However, some misconceptions require correction
Authors and Affiliations
Wala'a Abduraheem Abuharba, Abdullah Mohammad Algarni
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP732214
- DOI https://doi.org/10.52609/jmlph.v2i2.46
- Views 44
- Downloads 0
A systematic review of the systematic review of post COVID-19 syndrome
Background: The declaration of the COVID-19 pandemic triggered a global inquiry into the transmission, mortality, risk factors, and management of the disease. Recently, however, attention has shifted toward its long-term...
A critical case commentary on Avon and Wiltshire Mental Health Partnership and North Bristol NHS Trust v WA and DT: Did the judge reach a fair and just decision regarding the capacity and best interest of the person?
Avon and Wiltshire Mental Health Partnership and North Bristol NHS Trust v WA and DT [2020] EWCOP, [2020] 7 WLUK 271: This case critically evaluates the findings on WA’s capacity assessment and best interest decision mad...
Leaving The Emergency Department Without Being Seen or Without Complete Treatment; A Study From Saudi Arabia
Background, The attitude of Leaving the emergency department (ED) without being seen or without completing treatment is attributed to prolonged waiting time. The impact of such behaviour and fate of such patients remain...
Prevalence of Positive Blood Cultures in the Emergency Department of a Tertiary Hospital: A Retrospective Single-Centre Study
Background: Blood cultures (BCs) are frequently ordered during the course of investigation in emergency departments (EDs). However, there are few studies examining the clinical value of BCs and the prevalence of positive...
Public Health Law In Malaysia And The United States: Comparing Current Applications
Background: The main objective of public health law is to pursue the highest possible level of physical and mental health in the population, consistent with the values of social justice. Aims: To elaborate on Malaysia...