La peine de mort en Yugoslavie socialiste et le conflit des sources normatives
Journal Title: Meta: Research in Hermeneutics, Phenomenology, and Practical Philosophy - Year 2010, Vol 2, Issue 2
Abstract
The author analyses a discussion on death penalty that took place in Belgrade, at the end of the socialist era, between Igor Primorac and Ivan Jankovic. Primorac attacked the utilitarian justification of the socialist penal system, though he agreed on different, retributive grounds that death penalty for premeditated murder should be preserved. Jankovic advocated utilitarian ideas and rejected the death penalty as an atavistic aberration. In the first part of the article, their main arguments are presented and their contextual meaning is being explained. In the second part of the article, the author analyses those arguments and concludes that a) retributivism has not been the philosophy of death penalty during its history, b) that retentionist conclusions do not follow from retributive premises, c) that utilitarianism, in spite of its historical connection with abolitionism, can justify death penalty, d) that since the problem cannot be resolved on moral grounds alone, it should be resolved on political grounds, and e) that political considerations require the abolition of death penalty.
Authors and Affiliations
Ivan Vukovic
Pourquoi revient-on toujours à Darwin?
Mircea Flonta, Darwin şi după Darwin. Studii de filozofie a biologiei [Darwin et après Darwin. Études de philosophie de la biologie], Bucureşti: Humanitas, 2010
Behind the “Death of the Author”: Radical French Philosophy and the Fascination of the Sacred
Jean Christophe Goddard,[i]Violence et subjectivité. Derrida, Deleuze, Maldiney[/i], Paris: Vrin, 2008
A Bestiary of International Politics Lies
John Mearsheimer, Why Leaders Lie. The Truth About Lying in International Politics, New York: Oxford University Press, 2011
Philosophy: Morphology without Laws. Goethe and Wittgenstein on the Limits of Science
The present text exposes the influence of Goethe’s morphology on Wittgenstein’s concept of perspicuous representation. Through this process, it is demonstrated that Goethe and Wittgenstein, each in their manner, in diffe...
The Mystagogia of Maximus the Confessor
Maximi Confessoris, Mystagogia: una cum Latina interpretatione Anastasii Bibliothecarii, edita a Christian Boudignon, Turnhout: Brepols, Corpus Christianorum. Series Graeca, nr. 69, 2011, 187 + 99 p.