Laparoscopic radical cystectomy: neobladder or ileal conduit, debate still goes on

Journal Title: Central European Journal of Urology - Year 2014, Vol 67, Issue 1

Abstract

Objective To compare the pre, intra, and post–operative data between ileal conduit and neobladder urinary diversions during laparoscopic radical cystectomy(LRC). Material and methods Between 2006 and 2011, 63 patients who underwent LRC and urinary diversion had their data input prospectively into a database and said data used for the analysis. The outcome comparators were the patient demographics, operative time, conversion rate, blood loss, transfusion rate, morphine analgesic requirement, length of hospital stay, complication rates, follow up, and quality of life assessments. A Mantel–Haenszel test was used for dichotomous data and an inverse variance method was used for continuous data. P values less than 0.5 were considered significant Results Thirty–nine patients (60 ±7.11 years) had ileal conduits and 24 patients (57 ±8.68 years) had neobladder urinary diversion. No difference was found (P >0.05) regarding age, BMI, smoking history, TURBT pathology result, blood loss, blood transfusion requirement, conversion rates, length of hospital stay, morphine requirement, complications, or follow–up and quality of life. The neobladder groups did have more previous abdominal operations and had significantly longer operative time. Conclusions We found no difference between either types of diversion in all comparative aspects except that the neobladder had longer operative times. This is the first comparative study between ileal conduit and neobladder urinary diversion after laparoscopic radical cystectomy and can pose as a bench mark for future comparisons.

Authors and Affiliations

Omar M. Aboumarzouk Aboumarzouk, Tomasz Drewa, Paweł Olejniczak, Piotr L. Chlosta

Keywords

Related Articles

Artificial urinary conduit construction using tissue engineering methods

Introduction Incontinent urinary diversion using an ileal conduit is the most popular method used by urologists after bladder cystectomy resulting from muscle invasive bladder cancer. The use of gastro-intestinal tissu...

The histomorphological findings of kidneys after application of high dose and high-energy shock wave lithotripsy

Introduction In this animal study, we reviewed the histomorphological findings in rabbit kidneys after a high number of high-energy shock wave applications and observed if there were any cumulative effects after repeat...

Pfannenstiel incision for radical retropubic prostatectomy as a surgical and cosmetic alternative to the midline or laparoscopic approach: A single center study

Objectives The Pfannenstiel incision is not a very common approach for radical retropubic prostatectomy (RPE). This study is primarily dealing with the approach to the prostate. Material and methods A 10–12 cm Pfannensti...

Intratesticular hematoma after blunt scrotal trauma: a case series and algorithm–based approach to management

We present our experience with intratesticular hematoma (ITH) without rupture of the tunica albuginea following blunt scrotal trauma and present an algorithm for management. We reviewed the charts of 3 patients who prese...

Helicobacter pylori: a sexually transmitted bacterium?

Introduction Oral sex (fellatio) is a very common sexual activity. H. pylori is mainly a gastric organism, but studies have reported that infected individuals may permanently or transiently carry H. pylori in their mouth...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP325026
  • DOI 10.5173/ceju.2014.01.art2
  • Views 47
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Omar M. Aboumarzouk Aboumarzouk, Tomasz Drewa, Paweł Olejniczak, Piotr L. Chlosta (2014). Laparoscopic radical cystectomy: neobladder or ileal conduit, debate still goes on. Central European Journal of Urology, 67(1), 9-15. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-325026