Late best response to cardiac resynchronization therapy is associated with better survival of patients with congestive heart failure

Journal Title: Current Research: Cardiology - Year 2017, Vol 4, Issue 4

Abstract

AIM: The aim was to evaluate clinical, morphological, functional features and mortality in patients with congestive heart failure (CHF) and different time of the best response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: 122 patients (82.8% men) with NYHA functional class III-IV (mean age 54.8 ± 9.6 years) were enrolled. At baseline, 1, 3 months and each 6 months after implantation we evaluated clinical and echocardiographic parameters. In 28 patients the best decrease of left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) was achieved up to 3 months (1.1 ± 0.9 months, I group–early response) and in 94 patients–after 3 months (22.6 ± 14.9 months, II group–late response). RESULTS: At baseline groups did not differ in main clinical characteristics, the proportion of atrial fibrillation, the presence of left bundle-branch block (LBBB), width of the QRS complex and parameters of mechanical dyssynchrony. Level of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and left ventricular volumes were comparable between groups. In the II group responders (decrease in LVESV ≥ 15%) were identified more frequently (90.4% vs. 60.7%; p=0.001), all patients with decrease of LVESV ≥ 30% (super responders) had late response. During follow-up period (33.2 ± 16.7 months) increase in LVEF and decrease in LVESV were more evident in patients with late response. In Kaplan-Meier analysis mortality in II group was significantly lower (3.2% vs 28.6%; p=0.001). Cox regression showed that LVESV (HR 1.012; 95% CI 1.004–1.021; P=0.005) and the time of response (HR 0.131; 95% CI 0.032– 0.530; P=0.004) were associated with long-term mortality. CONCLUSION: Patients with early response to CRT show significantly lower improvement in LVEF and LVESV compared to patients with late CRT response. Super respone to CRT in associated with late functional improvement. Early response and greater LVESV are associated with higher mortality rate.

Authors and Affiliations

Soldatova AM, Kuznetsov VA, Krinochkin DV, Enina TN, Gorodniuk IG

Keywords

Related Articles

A case report of Klinefelter’s syndrome hiding behind pulmonary embolism

Klinefelter’s syndrome, characterized by a karyotype of XXY, is characterized by a series of clinical manifestation such as hypogonadism, small testes, gynecomastia and infertility. This condition promotes hypofribrinoly...

Nonbacterial thrombotic endocarditis - Not forgotten

We report the case of a 36-year-old man who presented with an incidental echocardiographic finding of a 1.1 × 0.8 cm mobile structure on the mitral valve associated with mild to moderate eccentric jet of mitral regurgita...

Glycosylated hemoglobin and adverse events following elective coronary bypass revascularization

BACKGROUND: The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate whether the level of preoperative glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) is associated with incidence of major adverse events in patients undergoing elective coron...

Cardiomyopathy in patients with Marfan syndrome and marfanoid habitus

OBJECTIVES: The term “Marfan cardiomyopathy” is used to indicate changes in left ventricular function in the absence of significant valvular pathology in Marfan syndrome. It is still unknown if there are any changes in c...

Long QT syndrome with torsade in a patient with atrial fibrillation taking antihistamines– Case report

OBJECTIVE: To report the case of a patient with long QT syndrome acquired after treatment of atrial fibrillation associated with the regular use of antihistamines. METHODS: The data of this work were obtained by reviewi...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP602946
  • DOI -
  • Views 22
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Soldatova AM, Kuznetsov VA, Krinochkin DV, Enina TN, Gorodniuk IG (2017). Late best response to cardiac resynchronization therapy is associated with better survival of patients with congestive heart failure. Current Research: Cardiology, 4(4), 58-60. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-602946