Legal measures of preventing administrative delicacy: the criteria of efficiency

Abstract

In this article, the study of the criteria for the effectiveness of the application of legal measures to prevent administrative delict. The category of "efficiency" was considered through the economic prism of the ratio between the results obtained and the resources expended on their achievement, which resulted in the criteria for the effectiveness of the prevention of administrative delicacy, namely: maximum, medium and low. It has been determined that preventive measures to prevent administrative delusions should bebased on the principles of legality, purposefulness of prevention, complexity, resource and organized security, quality and effectiveness, etc. As a result of the study, the definition of "prevention of administrative delicacy" was given a set of parameters based on social conditions capable of realizing the preparedness of the preventive system for the awareness of social needs in preventive activities, their transfer to the system of goals and the achievement of results that are consistent with the goals set. The concept of efficiency, emerging in the field of economics, in the future became general scientific and belong to all branches of knowledge. However, the processes of intensification of social development led to the need to use this category in all the areas of social work and management, including the field of crime prevention and administrative delicacy. The functioning and development of the system of the prevention of administrative misconduct causes the urgent need to develop criteria, as well as qualitative and quantitative approaches to the concept of efficiency. In this regard, it should be noted that at present it is very important to obtain accurate data on the achievement of the goals of legal education, which is due to the calculation of many social factors determine the behavior of social groups and individuals. Important is also the task of obtaining data on the relationship between the objectives of the preventive measures and their results. Such kind of information would allow us to draw conclusions not only about the quality of executive activity, but also about the obstacles on the way to the realization of the set goals.

Authors and Affiliations

Є. В. Шульга

Keywords

Related Articles

Decentralization of public power as a major factor of providing sustainable development of Ukraine: search of common vectors

Common vectors of scientific discourse of the problem of decentralization and federalization as a main factor of providing the development of Ukraine. The experience of European countries that solved this problem succe...

Basic principles of Barack Obama administration’s foreign policy: Russian context

The 44th president of the United States - Barack Obama belongs to American leaders, whose policy has caused the most controversial expert assessments. On the one hand, the United States welcomed Obama’s aspirations to ch...

First state formations on Ukrainian territory

The article describes the first state formations in Ukraine in the Northern Black Sea process of formation and development encountered at the end of the first millennium BC - early first millennium AD. The authors anal...

Types of special knowledge used for investigation of illegal handling a weapon, ammunition or explosives

For the successful disclosure and investigation of crimes to investigators and other participants in the criminal process involved in the investigation, it is necessary to make full use not only of their professional leg...

The informational dimension of hybrid warfare

Combination of "hard" and "soft" power through the use of military and non-military means, in particular, mass media in the context of strategic conduct of modern conflicts. Relevance of the researched topic is validated...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP445572
  • DOI -
  • Views 102
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Є. В. Шульга (2017). Legal measures of preventing administrative delicacy: the criteria of efficiency. Вісник Національного технічного університету України “Київський політехнічний інститут”. Політологія. Соціологія. Право., 1(), 247-251. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-445572