Legal positions of the US Supreme Court regarding the admissibility of restrictions on freedom of speech and freedom of creativity
Journal Title: Юридические науки и образование - Year 2017, Vol 53, Issue 53
Abstract
It is examined the position of the US Supreme Court, in comparison with the position of the European Court of Human Rights, on the protection of the right to freedom of creativity as freedom of speech and press and the permissibility of restrictions in this sphere. It is established that the peculiarity of the position of the US Supreme Court is the emphasis on the dangers in public administration, inherent in the restriction on the part of the state, and the need to prefer restriction, if necessary, through self-regulation. The history of prohibitions and permits for some creative works, as well as the approaches of the Motion Picture Association of America (МРАА) to the ratings of the permissibility of the distribution of television films are considered
Authors and Affiliations
Julia Iurynets
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP249324
- DOI 10.25108/2304-1730-1749.iolr.2017.53.173-206
- Views 106
- Downloads 0
Review of the monograph of I.M. Rahimov “Philosophy of crime and punishment”
The book is a result of long and considerable thinking. Arguments given at the book are stated exactly and clearly; general scene designed in the details, from which is followed that the law is mainly criminal, at wide s...
An essence of humanism in criminal proceedings
In order to work out a common conception of humanization of criminal procedural relationships there should be determined a core of humanism in criminal proceedings. Criminal procedural relationships are the legal relati...
Victim as a sign of corpus delicti
It is considered the criminal and legal conception of the victim and his place in the system of signs of corpus delict, and is analyzed his ratio with a conception of the victim in the legislation of the criminal procedu...
Conflicts of criminal procedural legislation of Azerbaijan Republic in part of objectives, principles and conditions of criminal proceedings
Code of Criminal Procedures of Azerbaijan Republic contains many imperfections and contradictions that excludes its optimal functioning; status of many persons who participate in criminal process in the CCP is not define...
Discursivity of objectives, principles and terms as the basis of fairness of court proceedings
Criminal procedure legislation of Azerbaijan Republic in part of the main notions, objectives, principles and terms of criminal court proceedings is not corresponded to the provisions of discursivity.