Limitations of the right to free movement in the enforcement procedure (III)

Journal Title: Revista Institutului Național al Justiției - Year 2017, Vol 41, Issue 2

Abstract

In this study, it is noted that the disposition of forced bringing the debtor also may cause restrictions to the freedom of movement in enforcement proceedings. It is revealed that the concepts of „forced bringing” and „bringing under constraint” are equivalent. It is indicated that if the debtor fails to appear repeatedly at the request of the enforcer, the court, upon the request of the enforcer will dispose forced bringing in front of the debtor. It is opined that forced bringing of managers, accountants or legal entity founders debtor transgresses freedom of movement within the state. It stresses that while requesting for the forced bringing of debtor enforcer will prove sending repeated (2 times consecutively) summons to the debtor in the manner prescribed by the legislature, the non-fulfilment of the enforceable document, the fact that the default of the debtor would be an impediment to successful enforcement, and not least, if the debtor’s state of health allows it. Also, it is highlighted that forced bringing measure has, at times an intimidating character and a strong psychological effect. However, it should aim to boost the execution of an enforceable document that contains personal obligation incumbent upon the individual. Finally, the study trilogy that has as subject of research questionable limitations of the right to free movement in the procedure of enforcement of Moldova ends with conclusions and lege ferenda proposals intended to streamline the legal framework in the matter investigated.

Authors and Affiliations

Dumitru Visternicean, Gheorghe Reniță

Keywords

Related Articles

Summoning and bringing by force of an offender before court

Summoning and bringing by force of an offender represent important procedural actions, established to provide proper notification of the offender regarding the procedures in progress, as well as to ensure the appearance...

The organized criminal group in the context of transnational criminality

The priority of international normative acts on the national legislation doesn’t consist only in the supreme juridical force by itself, but also in an universal practice available for all abstracted situations, apart fro...

Scientific-practical importance and utility of the judge`s activity in exercising and strengthening of justice

Activity on justice court under authority delegated by law, as a spear tip in the exercise of rule of law, is monitored and watched very carefully by the public and thus the scientific-practical activity, which is a part...

THREATENING WITH THE TERRORIST ACT: FORM OF EXPRESSION OF THE OFFENCE REFERRED TO IN PAR. (1) ART. 278 PC RM

The purpose of the study is to analyze the threat of committing the terrorist act as a form of expression of the offense provided by art.278 PC RM. It is shown that the threat of committing the terrorist act can embrace...

Bringing by force and notice in search - present ensuring of the defendant in the court

In this article we will analyze the legal provisions and the procedure of forced labor demand and announcement ordered by the court after the procedure of legal summoning of a defendant who has been evaded since the pres...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP194327
  • DOI -
  • Views 118
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Dumitru Visternicean, Gheorghe Reniță (2017). Limitations of the right to free movement in the enforcement procedure (III). Revista Institutului Național al Justiției, 41(2), 44-49. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-194327