Locked Compression Plating Versus Intramedullary Interlocking Nailing In The Management Of Diaphyseal Humerus Fracture - Randomized Control Trail

Abstract

With the recognition of the role of vascularity and soft tissue in fracture healing, Locking Compression Plates were developed. LCP leave minimal footprints on the surface of bone in comparison to conventional plates. The use of Intramedullary locking nails has recently gained momentum after their dramatic success in fixation of lower limb fractures. There are very few studies comparing these two newer methods of fixation. This prospective, randomized study compares these two fixation methods. 57 patients in IMN group were compared with 51 patients in LCP group. Both groups were comparable in term of age, gender, duration of injury, site and comminution at fracture site. Patients were evaluated for intraoperative blood loss, surgery time, radiation exposure, post-operative radial nerve palsy, duration of post operative stay, infection rate, reoperation rate and union time during follow up. At each follow up, sign of union were assessed. Functional evaluation was done at 1 year with ASES and RM score. IMN group showed significantly better results in term of intra-operative blood loss and less post operative hospital stay. The less operative time and an earlier tendency towards union were also seen in IMN group although not statistically significant. Fewer complications in term of infection and radial nerve palsy in IMN group seen. The final union rates were same in both groups. Although shoulder stiffness remained a concern in nailing group, functional evaluation at 1 year showed nailing to be superior to plate fixation group. With the use of LCP reoperation rate was also comparable in both groups. With more and more patients demanding for minimally invasive surgeries, nailing can be a preferred method for fixation of diaphyseal fractures of the humerus.

Authors and Affiliations

SPS Gill, ankit mittal, sunil kumar, Manish Raj, Pulkesh Singh, javed Ali

Keywords

Related Articles

Management of displaced middle third clavicular fractures with superior reconstruction plating

Background :The management of clavicle fractures is inclining towards fixation for displaced middle-third clavicle fractures as the conservative treatment gives poor results. There was no evidence to suggest that early o...

Immediate Versus Delayed Hip Spica For Pediatric Shaft Femur Fractures- A NonRandomised Clinical Trial

Context: Multiple treatment options are available for pediatric femoral shaft fractures. For age of 1- 6 years, treatment is either by immediate hip spica or traction followed by delayed hip spica application. Aims: To c...

Assessment Of Outcome Of Proximal Humerus Fractures Treated With Various Surgical Modalities In Elderly

Displaced proximal humeral fractures when treated surgically produce less pain, less stiffness and greater ROM. Earlier the surgery better are the results. In severely comminuted fractures where anatomy cannot be restore...

Traumatic paraplegia: evaluation of fuctional recovery of thoracolumbar fracture fixation in relation to preoperative neurological deficit

Fractures of thoracolumbar spine are common injury with variety of operative and non-operative management options. There remains debate as to the optimal treatment for a given patient & fracture.Our aim was to assess the...

Functional And Radiological Outcome Of Midclavicular Fractures Treated With Titanium Elastic Nailing

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Our objective was to evaluate clinical and radiological outcomes ofMidclavicular fractures treated with Titanium elastic nailing. MATERIALS AND METHODS The clinical study was a prospective s...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP393563
  • DOI -
  • Views 137
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

SPS Gill, ankit mittal, sunil kumar, Manish Raj, Pulkesh Singh, javed Ali (2016). Locked Compression Plating Versus Intramedullary Interlocking Nailing In The Management Of Diaphyseal Humerus Fracture - Randomized Control Trail. International Journal of Orthopaedics Traumatology & Surgical Sciences, 2(1), 14-23. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-393563