Magical thinking in predictions of negative events: Evidence for tempting fate but not for a protection effect

Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2013, Vol 8, Issue 1

Abstract

In this paper we test two hypotheses regarding magical thinking about the perceived likelihood of future events. The first is that people believe that those who “tempt fate” by failing to take necessary precautions are more likely to suffer negative outcomes. The second is the “protection effect”, where reminding people of precautions they have taken leads them to see related risks as less likely. To this end, we describe the results from three attempted direct replications of a protection effect experiment reported in Tykocinski (2008) and two replications of a tempting fate experiment reported in Risen and Gilovich (2008) in which we add a test of the protection effect. We did not replicate the protection effect but did replicate the tempting fate effect.

Authors and Affiliations

Job van Wolferen, Yoel Inbar and Marcel Zeelenberg

Keywords

Related Articles

The collective intelligence of random small crowds: A partial replication of Kosinski et al. (2012)

We examined the trade-off between the cost of response redundancy and the gain in output quality on the popular crowdsourcing platform Mechanical Turk, as a partial replication of Kosinski et al. (2012) who demonstrated...

Relativistic financial decisions: Context effects on retirement saving and investment risk preferences

We report a study of the effects the choice set on financial decision making related to retirement savings and risky investment. The participants were presented with either a full range of choice options or a limited sub...

Attribute framing affects the perceived fairness of health care allocation principles

Health care resource allocation is a central moral issue in health policy, and opinions about it have been studied extensively. Allocation situations have typically been described and presented in a positive manner (i.e....

Preference for increasing wages: How do people value various streams of income?

Prior studies have found that subjects prefer an improving sequence of income over a constant sequence, even if the constant sequence offers a larger present-discounted value. However, little is known about how these pre...

The tide that lifts all focal boats: Asymmetric predictions of ascent and descent in rankings

In six studies, we find evidence for an upward mobility bias, or a tendency to predict that a rise in ranking is more likely than a decline, even in domains where motivation or intention to rise play no role. Although pe...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP678042
  • DOI -
  • Views 119
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Job van Wolferen, Yoel Inbar and Marcel Zeelenberg (2013). Magical thinking in predictions of negative events: Evidence for tempting fate but not for a protection effect. Judgment and Decision Making, 8(1), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-678042