Management of both forearm bone diaphyseal fractures - ORIF v/s CRIF v/s hybrid fixation: An operative dilemma

Journal Title: Indian Journal of Orthopaedics Surgery - Year 2018, Vol 4, Issue 3

Abstract

Introduction Long bone fracture of forearm is common skeletal injury The most common causes of such injuries include road traffic accident fall or direct trauma amongst the various types of forearm fractures bothbone diaphyseal forearm fractures in adults are frequently met by the orthopaedic doctors There are various methods available for fixation of both bone diaphysial fractures like both bone plate fixation both bone intramedullary nailing and hybrid method with nailing in one of the bones and plating in other Our aim of the study is which method of fixation is most clinically justifiable in both bone diaphysial fractures amongst all the available choicesMaterials and Methods This is a retrospective study of 200 cases of diaphyseal fractures of radius ulna selected randomly over a period two year from March 2016 to March 2018 conducted at civil hospital Ahmedabad All patients were followed up for a period 6 months post operativelyResult and Conclusion After studying result of all four method of fixation hybrid fixation showed good union rate less chance of infection less chance of malunion and non unionrelatively good stability less incidence of swelling and better recovery with a less chance of implant removal incidence and failure Keywords Radius ulna fracture Plating nailing Both bone diaphyseal fracture

Authors and Affiliations

Hriday Acharya, Anil Nayak, Zulfikar Patel, Dhaval Devani

Keywords

Related Articles

Study of factors affecting the outcome of operative management of malleolar fractures

Introduction One of the most common fractures an orthopaedic surgeon encounters is Malleolar fractures As with all intra articular fractures accurate reduction and stable internal fixation of malleolar fractures is desir...

Incidence of obstacles and complications during distraction histogenesis

The last two decades have witnessed a significant rise in high velocity trauma and violent incidents like bomb blasts and firearm injuries. This has led to increase in severely comminuted open fractures with infection, s...

Short Term Results with Z Plasty for Checkrein Deformity Following Tibia Fractures

Introduction: Checkrein deformity is rarely seen following fracture in the leg bones. The surgical treatments is the method of choice but the site of release at the fracture site or at the midfoot are debatable. Since th...

Epidemiology and operative management of non-union in long bones

Introduction: Non-union is a serious complication of fracture. Management of non-union has remained a constant challenge. The associated bone defect, shortening, deformity and infection complicate the management. Present...

Arthroscopic staple fixation in the management of displaced anterior cruciate ligament avulsion fractures

Introduction Knee injuries are commonly associated with anterior cruciate ligament ACL avulsion fractures and its management is controversial ranging from conservative treatment to arthroscopic fixation The purpose of ou...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP476633
  • DOI 10.18231/2395-1362.2018.0044
  • Views 67
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Hriday Acharya, Anil Nayak, Zulfikar Patel, Dhaval Devani (2018). Management of both forearm bone diaphyseal fractures - ORIF v/s CRIF v/s hybrid fixation: An operative dilemma. Indian Journal of Orthopaedics Surgery, 4(3), 221-224. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-476633