Management of vesicovaginal fistulas after gynecologic surgery

Journal Title: Turkish Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology - Year 2017, Vol 14, Issue 1

Abstract

Objective: In developed nations, surgery, especially gynecologic procedures, is the major cause of vesicovaginal fistulas (VVFs). We retrospectively evaluated our treatment modalities for VVF repair caused by a gynecologic surgery, and discussed the reasons of selecting certain surgical techniques and their outcomes. Materials and Methods: We compared the surgical procedure preferences of surgeons and their results with patient and surgeon characteristics for the management of VVFs after an inciting gynecologic surgery in Süleyman Demirel University Hospital, Isparta over a 10-year period. The surgical procedures were undertaken in departments of urology and obstetrics and gynecology. Results: Abdominal repair was chosen for 65%, vaginal repair for 25%, and laparoscopic repair for 10% of patients. For the 75% of the patients that urologists operated, they chose the abdominal route. The mean parity number of patients who underwent abdominal repair was lower than that for vaginal repairs (p<0.05). For the patients managed with the vaginal route, 20% had a Martius flap, and 80% had a simple excision and repair. For patients operated via the abdominal route, 18% needed omental flap; no tissue interposition was used for the rest. The mean hospitalization time was less in patients managed with transvaginal repair (3.4 days) compared with transabdominal repair (9.2 days) (p<0.05). Conclusion: The choice of repair method depends on surgeon’s training (gynecology vs. urology). The vaginal route should be the first choice because it does not compromise the success rate and the mean hospitalization time is less. For the transvaginal approach, access to the lesion is the most important factor for the success of the procedure. No flap is needed for tissues that appear well vascularized.

Authors and Affiliations

Burak Tatar, Taylan Oksay, Fatma Selcen Cebe, Sedat Soyupek, Evrim Erdemoğlu

Keywords

Related Articles

Use of clomiphene citrate alone, urinary follicle-stimulating hormone alone, or both combined sequentially in patients with unexplained subfertility undergoing intrauterine insemination: A randomized trial

Objective: To compare the successes of clomiphene citrate (CC) alone, pure human urinary follicle-stimulating hormone (uFSH) alone, and both combined sequentially in patients with unexplained subfertility couples undergo...

Laparoscopic repair of ureter damaged during laparoscopic hysterectomy: Presentation of two cases

Ureter injuries are uncommon but dreaded complications in gynecologic surgery and a frequent cause of conversion to laparotomy. Recently, a few papers reported the repair of gynecologic ureteral injuries using laparoscop...

Role of positron emission tomography-computed tomography in endometrial cancer

Objective The efficacy of preoperative 18F-fluoro-D-glucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) in endometrium cancer is controversial. We examined the efficacy of PET-CT and the associati...

A retrospective comparative study of prednisolone use in antagonist co-treated assisted reproductive technology cycles for patients with good prognosis

Objective: To investigate the impact of peri-implantation prednisolone use and its duration in antagonist co-treated assisted reproductive technology (ART) cycles of patients with good prognosis. Materials and Methods:...

Intra-cesarean insertion and fixation of frameless intrauterine devices

Various contraceptive methods are available to postpartum women including hormonal and nonhormonal barriers, as well as injectable forms. Of all the available birth control methods, intrauterine devices (IUD) are felt by...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP240591
  • DOI 10.4274/tjod.46656
  • Views 146
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Burak Tatar, Taylan Oksay, Fatma Selcen Cebe, Sedat Soyupek, Evrim Erdemoğlu (2017). Management of vesicovaginal fistulas after gynecologic surgery. Turkish Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 14(1), 45-51. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-240591